Post a response:
|
you dont have to apologize, if you disagree thats fine. As I said in my answer to Eric, we are already allowed to hug and possibly kiss boys that we know. If his argument is "children need physical affection" then its hardly an earth shattering argument, almost every sane person would already agree. Although physical affection from their primary caregiver and the people they are closest to is the most valuable. I very much doubt that is the argument he is making, but he can correct me if he likes In his original post, in his footnote he says Unfortunately, no emphasis is given above on how non-parental, not-familiar adult males may be highly suited for working with children, particularly boys, who have suffered deprivation. I'll have to work harder on my ChatGPT "prompts," won't I? In the meantime, I volunteer my services to work with all those innocent young boys (skinny ones receiving priority) deprived of sufficient physical affection, as well as making my services available to foster the healthy sexual development of young males, where permitted by law. Are you with me, or against me? NOTE FOR THOSE INTERESTED: The line forms on the right. No pushing or shoving, please. You'll all get your chance to participate. This sounds very much like sex to me. |