Post a response:
|
No, that's not true. There are men sitting in prison, today, who have done nothing more than hugging and kissing. How? As far as I am aware, hugging a boy isnt illegal, so there must have been more going on? Or the judge/court concluded that hugging a boy was sexual? I think that Manstuprator made valid points about the need for affection independently of the BL issue. Sure, but as I said, its not an earth shattering argument. Most sane people would agree that children need physical affection. To me, it sounds like you don't think he should be making that point because he is a BL. One gets the impression that you are making an argument that a BL, or at least, that particular BL, has no legitimate authority to express support for affection as though he has a conflict of interest that renders any such expression compromised. All his other AI generated posts have been in support of sex with children, or talking about how opposition to sex with children is detrimental. Its reasonable to conclude that the argument he is making is indeed the one I outlined, that is, Children need physical affection, sex is physical affection, therefore BLs should get to have sex with children. I think that is what was meant by you sounding like a non-BL castigating BL's. I wasnt castigating anyone. I was pointing out that its a terrible argument. |