Threaded index     Date index     FAQ


Talk Back! Guide to media action [link]

Posted by Manstuprator on 2024-April-12 23:47:00, Friday

Dated (1982) guide for gays/lesbians to confront and deal with disinformation in the media and elsewhere about homosexuals. Contains some information that could be used today by (so-called) "pedophile activists":

English [en], .pdf, /ia, 5.6MB, Book (unknown), talkbackgayperso0000unse
Talk back!: the gay person's guide to media action
Boston: Alyson Publications, 1982
Lesbian and Gay Media Advocates
description
“119 p. ; 22 cm”
Lesbian and Gay Media Advocates.
Published as a paperback original by Alyson Publications, Inc., Boston.
First printing: September, 1982.
ISBN 0 932870 10 4

Contents
. The History of Media Work, 13
. Introduction to the Media, 18
. Getting Started, 25
. Analyzing the Media, 29
. Response, 37
. Meeting with the Media, 47
. Continuing Media Work, 58
. A Publicity Primer, 66
Now Go Buy a Hundred Postcards, 87
Appendices:
. Sample Letters, 91
. Sample Story Ideas, 98
. Style Guidelines, 102
. Questions You'll Hear at a
Meeting with the Media, 105
. A Press Advisory, 108
. Addresses, 114

Introduction

Lesbian and Gay Media Advocates — a fancy name for a
small group of people who got fed up. Fed up with media
that too often either distort our lives, and thus add fuel to
the fires of discrimination, or ignore us, and thus do
nothing to counteract the prevailing misconceptions of
what it means to be a gay man or lesbian.

Some of us had been activists for years; for others,
attending a first LAGMA meeting was itself an act of courage.
At our meetings, we could share the sense of outrage,
analyze clippings, relate things we saw and heard on TV and
radio, plan strategies. We started writing letters, we
approached major media outlets (newspapers, local televi-
sion and radio stations) to set up meetings.

In the process we learned a lot. We learned that there
are many people in the media who will listen, who did grow
in their understanding of discrimination against lesbians
and gay men, and who want to do something about the
media's role in this.

We also learned that it is painful to do this sort of work.
Raising other people’s consciousness takes a lot out of you.
(And some people’s misconceptions do not budge — we dis-
covered that too.) One of the first things we had to learn
was to expect more. It was that long-internalized self-hatred
that had accounted for our passive acceptance of unaccept-
able media coverage — that and a belief that “they'll never
change, why should we try to do anything about it?”

But we did try. And they did change.
Now we want you, too, to expect more. We want you to
become a media activist, to do something about media
coverage of our lives. We guarantee that putting your out-
rage into a letter will do more for your health than squash-
ing, denying or internalizing that outrage.

Although this book is specifically concerned with
media coverage of lesbians and gay men, many of our points
and our strategies could easily be translated to the coverage
afforded women, people of color, elders, and the physically
and mentally disabled — in short, to any group of people
whose lives are often trivialized, sensationalized, maligned
or ignored by the media.

While we have tried to give enough information to
make various facets of the media understandable, we have
written this book mainly from our own experiences. Your
experiences might differ; if so, we’d like to hear from you.
Even if such differences exist, we hope they will not inter-
fere with our major goal: to encourage lesbians and gay men
to expect, to demand and to get fairer coverage of our lives
in the media.

Lesbian and Gay Media Advocates
c/o Gay Community News
P.O. Box 971
Boston, Mass. 02103

1. The History of Media Work

Today when we see exceptionally distorted media coverage
of lesbian and gay issues, it’s easy to feel like the situation is
hopeless. But actually we have made progress in the last
thirty years, due mostly to the efforts of lesbians and gay
men who have worked for better media coverage, and
there’s every reason to believe that progress can continue.

During the first half of the century, the subject of
homosexuality was virtually untouched by the media. The
average person could easily go through life without hearing
anything more than an occasional oblique reference to
“inverts” or ‘abnormal people.”

The first breakthrough came when the Kinsey Report
on male sexuality appeared in the late 1940s. It rapidly
became the talk of the country; it was described as the
fastest-selling and most talked-about book since Gone With
the Wind. One of Kinsey’s findings was widely quoted in
coverage of the report: he said that 37% of American males
have a homosexual experience after adolescence. Americans
now realized that perhaps homosexuality was not confined
to such a small, insignificant minority of the population.

Kinsey's report paved the way for the first truly positive
discussion of homosexuality in the mainstream media. In
1949, an exchange of views on male homosexuality
developed quite spontaneously in the letters pages of Satur-
day Review. These letters, including one by a self-identified
gay man, are surprising in two ways. First, they are
unprecedented. No other magazine or newspaper in the U.S.
is known to have permitted such an open, public discussion
of this subject. Second, most of the letters were as liberal as
the times could allow. The writers all abhorred “flaunting”;
they pointed out the great disparity between society's
stereotypes and the real homosexuals the writers knew.
They showed an acute awareness of the necessity and the
limitations of the closet. They began to bring into the open
subjects that had for too long been ignored.

It was an isolated and short-lived beginning. Soon the
witch-hunts of the McCarthy era began, and thousands of
government workers were fired because of their suspected
homosexuality. Late in 1949 Newsweek ran the article
“Queer People’. It began: The sex pervert, whether a
homosexual, an exhibitionist, or even a dangerous sadist, is
too often regarded merely as a ‘queer’ person who never
hurts anyone but himself....” The article never again
referred to homosexuals; it went on to give examples of men
murdering women and, in one case, a mother murdering her
infant son. But the damage was done; to the average News-
week reader, homosexuals were established as violent
psychopaths.

It was in this atmosphere that the Mattachine Society
was formed. Henry Hay, one of the founders, saw the
country moving toward fascism and McCarthyism. He
knew the target wouldn't be Jews — the Holocaust was too
fresh in the nation’s memory — or blacks, who were
starting to organize. It would be homosexuals. The purpose
of the Mattachine Society was “to unify isolated homosex-
uals.... to educate homosexuals and heterosexuals... .
and to assist our people who are victimized daily as a result
of our oppression.” [...]

DOWNLOAD HERE:
https://annas-archive.org/md5/d379faa79a76aae8484d7d1aa109c8f2

  • (https site) https://annas-archive.org/md5/d379faa79a76aae8484d7d1aa109c8f2
    [@nonymouse] [Guardster] [Proxify] [Anonymisierungsdienst]

  • Follow ups:

    Post a response:

    Nickname:

    Password:

    Email (optional):
    Subject:


    Message:


    Link URL (optional):

    Link Title (optional):


    Add your sigpic?

    Here are Seven Rules for posting on this forum.

    1. Do not post erotica or overly-detailed sexual discussions.
    2. Do not request, offer, or post links to illegal material, including pictures.
    3. Don't annoy the cogs.
    4. Do not reveal identifying details about yourself or other posters.
    5. Do not advocate or counsel sex with minors.
    6. Do not post admissions of, or accuse others of, potentially illegal activities.
    7. Do not request meetings with posters who are under age 18.

    Posts made to BoyChat are subject to inclusion in the monthly BoyChat Digest. If you do not want your posts archived in the BC Digest, or want specific posts of yours removed after inclusion, please email The BC Digest.