Threaded index     Date index     FAQ


TPKA ''Slim'' is lying. Here is proof.

Posted by martirwithacause on 2011-December-5 19:52:32, Monday
In reply to Search for Martirwithacause's Little Angel Stories posted by Slim on 2011-December-5 09:13:57, Monday

BACKGROUND INFORMATION: I have had a problem with TPKA "Slim". He asked me to e-mail him. I exchanged several e-mails with him. Then I got a funny feeling about him. Something just seemed strange. So, I did the smart thing. I apologized politely, and said I didn't wish to continue e-mailing him. I was not rude.

He tried to insist. He posted messages on the BC board. He tried to "explain" things to me.

Here's some important advice that could keep you out of prison, or even save your life.

When you feel uncomfortable corresponding with someone you meet on this forum, then BREAK OFF CONTACT IMMEDIATELY. Why? Because, your "feeling" might be right (it might ALSO be wrong) and the risk, if your feeling is right is so high that it is not worth taking.

I've now learned some more things about TPKA "Slim". When he gets frustrated or angry he becomes vindictive. He tries to hurt the person who angered him. Suppose that I had given him information about me? My name? My address? The names of YF's? What would be my situation now?

It is impossible to say exactly, but it *might* have meant a trip to prison, and perhaps for many years, if I had continued to correspond with him. So I see now that I was not mistaken. TPKA "Slim" is NOT to be trusted. He is dangerous. Be careful. He may also have another "nick" as well. (But maybe he doesn't.) All this, of course, is just "in my opinion".

But, of course, you can do what you like. E-mail him. Give him plenty of personal details. Then, just for fun, deliberately make him angry, just to see what he'll do. Don't worry - if you get arrested and go to prison, you can have a friend post your prison address here. Maybe someone will write you a letter...


"Slim" has made a number of false charges in his post here about me. These false charges go back to some things that happened almost a year ago. Yes, it is possible to prove the charges are false. But it would be very long and involved, with a lot of small details, and would be very boring. If someone requests, I can provide some links that, if you read through all of them carefully, you will see that the charges are false (actually, I have put the links at the end of this post). But, you will have to read perhaps hundreds of posts for it to be clear.

"Slim" has said some things that are false, but about recent posts of mine. These are easy to check. If you go back and read my "Little Angel" posts, you can spot the things that "Slim" said that are false. One easy to demonstrate example:

    "[He tells stories.] They are about a BL hero who lives with a sweet little boy (aka Little Angel), the little boy's father and the family's dog and cat. Little Angel's parents are really self centered jerks - the father always forgets to feed the pets and the mom is a drug addict that decided to abandon the family."

The mother is not a drug addict. If you go back and read what I posted, you will immediately see that the mother is not the drug addict. A *woman renting another room in the apartment* is a drug addict. And, the mother *did not* abandon the family. She went on vacation. She left the 21st of November, to spend a month with her family in Peru. She's supposed to be back around the 20th of December.

TPKA "Slim" said something that is not true! About me! And in order to try to hurt my reputation!

Where I come from, we that call that "lying". Maybe from where *you* come from they do, too.


Whether the man and his wife are "self centered jerks" is open for interpretation. As is is whether I am such a "hero" or not.

    Everyone in the stories is so manipulative and self centered, you always wonder who is going to out manipulate who. After the drama is said and done the BL hero always gets the best of his challengers and teaches them a lesson of some sort.

Yes, the mother and father are manipulative. The father is especially self-centered. The "BL hero" (me) doesn't "teach them a lesson". I explain things to them. If they learn, good. If not, well that's life.

    Martirwithacause has always told stories...

The content here at BC is generated by the posters. I didn't tell many BM's before, and the ones I told were ignored. Later I was encouraging other people to post their experiences with boys. BUT - If If hadn't been willing do it myself, it would have been hypocritical. I began posting BM's. Some were very "racy". People accused me of faking them. Then I decided to post about my day-to-day life with Little Angel. I'm not "telling stories". I'm just describing my daily life. (It's all over now. Something happened. I would have liked to put the details in a post. But I have spent *so much time* on this post that maybe I won't. Sorry. You can thank TPKA "Slim" for that. It's all his fault... Isn't BC great! [that is sarcasm])

    ...but ever since he got limited to five posts a week he has used a lot of his quota to tell these stories. Prior to the limits being placed on him he spent so much time causing trouble and insulting people that we plotted a campaign of harassment (on a secrete board) to get rid of him.

This post itself (can you believe it?) may be used by certain people as an example of me "causing trouble and insulting people"! Can you believe it? Incredible! But wouldn't you consider HIS post - with lies that can be proved, in black-and-white, a *real* attempt at "causing trouble and insulting people"?

If you tell lies at work about the sexual activities of a co-worker, you can be arrested for "sexual harassment". Harassing people here at BC is against one of the rules. But, for some strange reason, it is *permitted by the cogs* that some posters tell *obvious* lies about other posters. Lies that are easily proven to be lies! And posters can do it in order to damage the credibility of other board members. Incredible, isn't it?

(Some day, if some poster finally gets fed up with being harassed here, it *might* be possible to even file suit in a court of law to stop the harassment! Of course, the poster would have to first "out" himself. But, if the poster were very very careful about any off-board activities, it may be impossible for him to be charged by the police with any crime. So he would be safe to out himself, and file a suit. It would be interesting to see what would happen next. The police would have to subpoena the logs of the board, of course, in order to establish identities and IP addresses. The admin of BC, in failing to provide the logs in that case, would be in violation of the law as well. So I hope that no-one ever does it. It might be bad for BC if that were to happen. But there is plenty of legal precedence regarding "anonymous" internet harassment and trolling. I wonder if the cogs have ever thought about that? They probably should, you know, in order to keep the board safe and "up and running". Just imagine the headlines!)


You can go back and look at the posts. jonasBark said that he started a board ("that I wasn't invited to join" or something like that) where they talked about how to "handle me" (or something like that). Several posters indicated that they had "discussed me" on that board. Plotting was apparently taking place. jonasBark started a vendetta against me about 10 months ago because, first, I explained how copyrights worked (he didn't understand the details correctly) and second because of the "index of thread-starter posts" that I created of all existing posts going back to 2003. All these posts HAVE ALREADY BEEN COPIED BY LEO AND ANTIS FROM THE BC SERVERS.

All the post were and are already known and available to the LEO's and the antis. The antis had already used the posts to "out" people here. They did this MANY YEARS BEFORE I CREATED THE INDEX. You can go to the anti sites and see reproductions of posts made 3 or 4 or 5 years ago. Before I made the index. Therefore, the index is NOT dangerous.

BUT jonasBark did not like the index to be available to other BL's here. There was NO QUESTION ABOUT EXPOSING HIM TO LEGAL CONSEQUENCES by making the index available. Perhaps he was embarrassed by something he posted long ago? Anyway, he began a battle against the index. He said it would cause legal problems for him and for others. THIS IS A LIE. But others have started to believe this lie. And other lies about me, too.

    We had decided that he was not really a boylover because he rarely mentioned loving boys in his posts and all of his "boymoments" prior to the limits were obvious poorly written fiction.

As part of the campaign of harassment against me, led by jonasBark (who was a former cog - go figure!) they decided to attack me and say I was a LEO, an anti, a troll, a fake BL, a liar, etc.

I never used to post BM's. Why? Because rule 6 says "Do not post admissions of, or accuse others of, potentially illegal activities"

If I post about my real-life experiences, I might easily violate this rule. (I also might NOT violate the rule.) So I didn't post BM's. Finally, as a way to show that I am who I say I am, with the experiences that I have had with BL, I started posting heavily edited BM's (so as to not violate Rule 6). I cannot say why I had to edit them so heavily - so do so possibly could violate Rule 6!

The members of the group who have been harassing me have repeatedly called me a liar. They said my BM's were not real. Well, some OTHER posters have agreed with me about some of the conclusions that I have drawn from the experiences behind the edited BM's that I have posted. They have said that they have noticed the same things that I have noticed.

No-one here can "prove" anything about their BL experiences. Well, "Slim" could post the details of his trial and incarceration for an experience with a boy (COGS - TPKA "SLIM" HAS POSTED ABOUT THIS ALREADY) so you can see that he has had at least one sexual experience with a boy.

I have never been arrested or convicted for an illegal sexual act with a boy. So I cannot "prove" anything. This does not mean that I haven't done anything, just that I have never been arrested and convicted of anything. (COGS - NOTE - I AM NOT ADMITTING ANYTHING EXCEPT I HAVE NOT BEEN ARRESTED. I AM ONLY DISCUSSING MY LACK OF AN ARREST RECORD. I AM NOT ADMITTING TO HAVING PERFORMED ANY SEXUAL ACTS WITH A BOY.)

Maybe I've *never* had a sexual experience with a boy. Maybe I *have* had a sexual experience with a boy. Maybe I have had lots of sexual experiences with many many boys. But then again maybe I *have never* had many many sexual experiences with boys. I cannot, and will not, admit here at BC to having had sexual experiences with boys, or having broken the law. It is against Rule 6 to do so.

Believe my stories or don't believe them. It's up to you. It makes no difference to me. And remember, no-one who HAS NOT been arrested and convicted can give the complete details of a sexual experience they had with a boy. BUT - that doesn't mean that others have not violated the law and had sexual experience. It is possible that I have. It is possible that I have not. Anything is possible...

    For example he actually used to post stories about paying boys he met in parking lots to let him suck them off and call that a boymoment, lol!

This is a lie, or at least the very least a *huge* exaggeration. ONCE I included something in the following post: "OK - now I ''get it''. Hoo boy... BoyMoments..."

Here is an extract from that post:

[...]
"Many people read, for example, adventure stories, and take vicarious pleasure in them. They may never "fight pirates" as a buccaneer, but they *do* enjoy reading about doing it.

They may never travel to far-off lands, eat exotic foods, experience incredibly different cultures, wear strange native clothing, climb coconut trees, trek through jungles (first hearing, then seeing, the monkeys high overhead swinging incredibly rapidly branch-by-branch through the tree-tops), sleep in a home-made hammock beside a small stream - in a gully surrounded by a volcanic plain - except on the side towards the long, deserted palm-tree skirted pure-white-powder-sand beach (deserted but for natives and the occasional nekkid kid), and the sea, sleep in a bamboo hut - where naked native kids run around - with no shame at all!, drink palm-sap wine from jars teeming with huge black flies, while the natives laugh as you try to hide your disgust - but you drink anyway - because it would be an insult to them if you did not, eat an almost-ready-to-be-hatched chicken embryo - still in the shell (and, because your local friend had plied you with whiskey first, to soften you up for trying the "balut", you after-wards feel queasy, so you go for a walk in the dark, where you see a cute kid dressed in shorts, a ragged t-shirt, and rubber sandals (maybe 10 or 11?) trudging idly through a parking lot, and he looks at you curiously, smiles, and says "Hi!", and you say "Hi! Hey, can I suck you off?" and the kid says, "Sure, why not?" and you do - it's over in a flash! (yeah, he cums, too!) (and you tip him a buck) - and then you return to the home of your friend, who asks, "What did you do?" and you smile to yourself and say, "Nothing. Just walked around a little.", while the taste of sweet hairless boy-penis is still in your mouth - you can still smell it! mmmmmmm...), travel the world, and fuck/suck/be fucked by really extraordinarily fantastically cute and perfect young boys who have no pubes at all, and then write incredibly long run-on sentences (hmm... what tense was that last part in? The subjunctive? I think so...)
[...]"


Please note - I did NOT say that I had a sexual experience with, or gave a blow job to, a boy in a parking lot. I was talking about the difference between people who read about things, and people who do things. If anyone (like TPKA "Slim") thought I was talking about my own personal experiences, well - I don't know why! If I had said I "payed boys I met in parking lots to let him suck them off" then this would have violated Rule 6.

I DID NOT say that I did. I only gave an example of something that is possible. Please notice also that there was not a mention of paying a boy for sex. It was mentioned that it would be possible to feel sorry for a boy who was very poor and to give him a dollar. This could be seen as a kind thing to do. Not as "payment" because, in the hypothetical example, the boy did it freely, without any discussion of payment. He wanted to do it. So, the hypothetical man in that story wanted to give the kid some money, too. If a man has sex with a women - with no mention of money - then gives her 20 bucks after, so she can go out and buy a nice dress or something - is that "paying for sex"? I don't think so.

A BoyMoment is any moment spent with a boy. Sexual boymoments cannot be told by someone who has not been arrested and convicted for the "crime". I have never admitted to having sex with boys. Never. But, then again, I have never DENIED having sex with boys, either. I never said I did, and I never said I didn't.

Maybe I didn't. Maybe I did. Maybe I'm 20 feet tall, and look like the Hulk! Maybe I'm 3 feet tall and run around saying, "The plane! The plane! Boss! There's the plane!"

And maybe I don't.

Who knows?

But there is one thing that I *DO* know. If you catch a person telling a lie, then you should be VERY CAREFUL in the future about believing that person. He may lie again...

Anyway, the campaign of harassment continues. The post made by TPKA "Slim" proves that.

What I've done with boys remains unproven. And unadmitted, as well! Just the way it should be at BC. If, for some unknown reason, you come to think that I have had lots of sex with lots of boys then, hey - you're welcome to think whatever you like! I'm not going to stop you... But I'll never admit it!

Read this and get a general idea of what has been done to me by a certain small group of posters here. And why they did it., Such a sad, sad state of affairs at BC...

If you really want the details, then read this, and copy/paste the links in the post into your browser address bar. Then you will see how the whole situation developed between me and a small group of trolls. A list of posts showing how the harassment began...

martirwithacause
[Another perfect example of a liar falsely accusing me of things. This time with PROOF that he is lying. This post sums up the problem of me being harassed, and gives links to other posts.] martirwithacausesticky

Follow ups:

Post a response:

Nickname:

Password:

Email (optional):
Subject:


Message:


Link URL (optional):

Link Title (optional):


Add your sigpic?

Here are Seven Rules for posting on this forum.

1. Do not post erotica or overly-detailed sexual discussions.
2. Do not request, offer, or post links to illegal material, including pictures.
3. Do not engage in campaigns of harassment against other posters.
4. Do not reveal identifying details about yourself or other posters.
5. Do not advocate or counsel sex with minors.
6. Do not post admissions of, or accuse others of, potentially illegal activities.
7. Do not request meetings with posters who are under age 18.

Posts made to BoyChat are subject to inclusion in the monthly BoyChat Digest. If you do not want your posts archived in the BC Digest, or want specific posts of yours removed after inclusion, please email The BC Digest.