Post a response:
|
When i started to study sexuality i ] read about random imprinting, random conditioning, etc. But the more i study it, the more i understand that it is not random. Sexuality emerges from something deeper, maybe from cognitive architecture and neuropsychological profile. After a lot of thinking and talking with people with different sexualities, i have pinpointed different types. Yes, genes cannot entirely hard-code human neural architecture the way they do in simpler organisms, but the resulting layouts are still not arbitrary. We can isolate several baseline sexual architectures that, upon interacting with environmental experience, compile into specific sexual forms: AGP/Trans: This is straightforward, it is a mirroring mechanism. It is a structure tied to the Default Mode Network (DMN) of the brain, driven by the dissolution of the ego/self into an external subject (mostly woman). Fetishism (e.g., feet, hands): This is a mechanism of hyper-fixation; the absolute concentration of attention onto highly specific, granular details. ABDL: A mechanism of regression; the explicit eroticization of care and vulnerability. BDSM: A purely structural sexuality. The roles are strictly defined and distributed; the processing scripts are rigid, deterministic, and highly predictable (e.g., bondage, impact play). Standard (Normative) Sexuality: By contrast, this is highly diffuse and fluid. It is not modeled by a rigid internal structure, but behaves more like an amorphous probability cloud, radically shifting its shape and state in response to emotional inputs... What is a pedophilia is this picture? Is it an eroticization of care for children?A sexuality based on emotional congruence with them? There are studies that show that individuals with pedophilia have strong emotional congruence with children... |