Post a response:
| I think that there is a huge multidimensional sexual hyperplane, and organisms try to find the point of local minimum during early development. After it is found, it stabilizes, and extra neuronal connections are pruned. Such pruning doesn't allow conversion. The question is why some points in such a hyperplane are optimal for one person and not for another. It is a difficult question, and I think that it emerges from neuropsychology, how a child sees the world, interacts with peers, and understands himself/herself. When a child sees a stimulus that resonates with their architecture, it isn't random imprinting or conditioning. It is an 'aha' moment, when the key fits the lock. |