"the idea that MAPs are monstrous sadists is about as far from the truth as possible." And yet the Mutards see fit to associate us with deranged murderers if it fits their narrative about being "pushed." "mixes up MAPs with situational offenders." Why would situational pedophiles be any more likely to be sadistic than anyone else? If sadists do not represent exclusive pedophiles, why would sadists represent situational pedophiles? "Situational offenders are not MAPs; they do not have any particular sexual interest in children" What's wrong with having a situational interest in minors? It's what makes our attractions mainstream and we should be leveraging that instead of falsely accusing them of sadism. "MAPs, on the other hand, are emotionally and sexually attracted to children or teens" As if you MAPists had a monopoly on having feelings. It's a mistake to think of yourself as so exceptional instead of sharing commonalities with the rest of humanity. "if they [pedophiles] ever act on their feelings, it will likely be from a place of warmth and love" This is a No True Scotsman fallacy. "Many MAPs, including myself, feel rather depressed when we don't have platonic friendships with young people." MAPists, like their woke cohorts, adopt a self-image steeped in grievance politics which increases the likelihood of disempowering ruminations which can be the source of self-induced depression. But putting that aside, the difference between platonic and non-platonic is just a difference of consummation. Like most "platonic" relationships, the possibility of a sexual or romantic interaction is always present even if it is not a serious goal. The spark of flirtation and closeness can be rewarding in of itself. This does not distinguish pedophiles from non-pedophiles. Additionally, non-pedophiles are also capable of enjoying children. "The reality is that MAPs form close friendships as devoted mentors toward those whom we love." Non-pedophiles are also perfectly capable to enjoying mentorship. This is a widely held human trait. "From a group selection perspective, it is possible that the role of MAPs would be to take care of young people in the event that parents were unavailable." From a group selection perspective, it's not apparent that wanting to fuck a boy confers any survival advantage for one's genes over that of any non-pedophile displaying the near universal feelings of protectiveness towards children. ![]() |