Post a response:
|
I don't think it's unreasonable for me to make use of my decades of life experience in making statements here. I can't really preface each boychat post that uses my experiential knowledge by trying to do a three-year psychology study on topics like "10 year old boys and their attitudes towards sex with adult males." In any case, it's a study that can't be objectively framed. Most 10 year old boys polled about their desire to have sex with adult males would have little idea what you were on about (and don't ask me to provide evidence for that statement too or we'll be in infinite regress) and, in any case, the questionnaire would never make it past the academic ethics committee. Just imagine: "It would be a nice idea to let a bearded male older than your father put his lips on your penis and slide them back and forth while touching the end of your penis with his tongue. Strongly agree, agree somewhat, neutral, disagree somewhat, strongly disagree." What I said had nothing to do with religion, and in spuriously raising that issue, you're simply demonstrating prejudice. In any case, being skeptical of the value of casual sex - the standpoint of Christianity that accepts sexual minorities - is not the same as being against sex. It is not an anti-sex viewpoint, it's a pro-intimacy viewpoint. You have no basis to accuse me of being anti-sex. |