Turning it around - who can vouch for Amicus?

Rather than going around and around in circles some more, I'm going to turn this around on Amicus. I remember his nick from a few years back, but he was active during my dormant period and I don't really know much about him. I seem to recall that back then he claimed to be a non-BL who is sympathetic to our plight, although now it appears that he's implying that he is a BL. That's not important, however. I'm not asking who can vouch that he's a BL, I'm asking who can vouch that he's truly our "Amicus'. Which BC regulars are willing to vouch that based on a sufficient amount of off-board interaction (of any variety), they are confident that Amicus is a supporter of boylovers and can be trusted to have, at least, good intentions? Giving reasons would be helpful but not necessary if you don't think it would be wise to post them. Before vouching to him, let's see if anyone will vouch for him. BTW, if you can vouch for him, but would rather not post that here, then if you trust me, please let me know in e-mail. I will not report who responded or reasons given, only whether and how many people responded, and whether any of them were posters who I personally trust. I want to emphasize that I am not asking anybody to trust me or saying that anybody should (everyone reading this should already know for themselves whether they trust me or not), I am only suggesting that you can e-mail me instead of posting if you prefer. Oh, one more thing - since I have a sense of what's relevant, and no ulterior motives (*cough* *cough*), I'm not going to ask who Amicus will vouch for, only who (if anyone) will vouch for Amicus. - Prometheus