You seem to like to emphasize what isn't the point

The entire point of my post was, as the subject indicates, to ask who can vouch for you. I'm not sure if you're doing it on purpose or if you're defensive about the subject, if you think that any part of the point of my post was to say that your past claims and present claims are inconsistent, then you misread it (or perhaps projected onto it?). Quite to the contrary, I was explicitly allowing that my past recollections about you are too vague to make any such assessment. Nor have I made assumptions about you of any sort, now or in the past. All I was really saying, in the part that you apparently misinterpreted, is that I'm unsure whether you claim to be a BL or a sympathetic non-BL, and therefore I'm not asking who can vouch, necessarily, that you're a BL, but rather who can vouch that you are whatever you claim you are. No takers so far. If you believe that this is because the thread has fallen too deep by now, feel free to make a new request of your own for BC regulars to vouch for your authenticity at the top of the index. Somehow, I strongly doubt that you will. Call it a hunch. - Prometheus