Threaded index     Date index     FAQ


Don't give anyone's name without permission

Posted by Prometheus on 2010-November-8 23:17:28, Monday
In reply to **We NEED and WANT Boylovers** posted by Amicus on 2010-November-8 21:31:28, Monday

I don't just mean real names, I mean don't anybody give out the nicknames, let alone e-mail addresses, of anyone who would vouch for you or anyone who you would vouch for without that person's permission. To do so would be a betrayal of your friendship.

The wild-eyed optimist might buy into the inspirational sales pitch that "that’s life in a nutshell, and you have to try at least one more time, every time, if you want to be a part of it. I think you understand what this means." and might be eager to give it the ol' college try and hope that this may be the beginning of a genuine BL activism movement.

The jaded cynic might smell a rat and impugn this as an attempt to collect information for putting together a database of interrelationships among BC members. He might also point out that Question 2 seems extraneous, because there is no good reason to ask those interested in participating for a list of everyone else they trust without determining first which, if any, of those people are interested, and that the added call emphasizing that you should "try not to leave anyone out" smells particularly fishy, because it sounds like they're more interested in the extensiveness of the information provided than in identifying individuals who self-select for this adventure.

The cynic might also point out that "I need addy’s NOT names and NO personal information at this time, for our mutual safety" appears disingenuous, because it makes it sound like they're concerned about your privacy and security and are specifically asking not to have any personal information revealed, but the information they ask you not to provide is the type of information that nobody except a deliberate back-stabber would ever even think to reveal, so they're essentially trying to score trust points by simply asking you not to give them information that you wouldn't have given them anyway. The cynic might suggest that the emphatic request not to give them information they know they're not going to get is a distraction from the fact that at the same time they're asking for "addys" (e-mail addresses) rather than just nicknames, which is a piece of information that most posters choose not to reveal on the board and many would not want given out. Keep in mind that indiscretions in providing e-mail addresses is one of the most common tools used by PJ to out BL's.

The question for you is not to determine whether you think the wild-eyed optimist is a gullible fool or the jaded cynic is overly paranoid and overthinks things to the point of paralysis. It's to realize that it's not your place to make that determination for all the BCers you trust and all those who trust you, it's each individual's place to make that call for themselves, and to decide for themselves if they want their e-mail addresses and friendships with other BL's revealed.

- Prometheus, promoting protection of personal privacy

Prometheus

Follow ups:

Post a response:

Nickname:

Password:

Email (optional):
Subject:


Message:


Link URL (optional):

Link Title (optional):


Add your sigpic?

Here are Seven Rules for posting on this forum.

1. Do not post erotica or overly-detailed sexual discussions.
2. Do not request, offer, or post links to illegal material, including pictures.
3. Do not engage in campaigns of harassment against other posters.
4. Do not reveal identifying details about yourself or other posters.
5. Do not advocate or counsel sex with minors.
6. Do not post admissions of, or accuse others of, potentially illegal activities.
7. Do not request meetings with posters who are under age 18.

Posts made to BoyChat are subject to inclusion in the monthly BoyChat Digest. If you do not want your posts archived in the BC Digest, or want specific posts of yours removed after inclusion, please email The BC Digest.