Threaded index     Date index     FAQ


Re: The Draft Argument for 12+

Posted by BLueRibbon on 2024-July-21 05:23:39, Sunday
In reply to Re: The Draft Argument for 12+ posted by Errant on 2024-July-21 01:53:45, Sunday

"This increases harm? What does it matter if you get AI child porn from an underground website or not? Even if it's illegal, it would be illegal regardless of where you got it from and the viewer would be harmed by getting locked up either way."

PIM = Prohibited Images of Minors. It doesn't only refer to AI CP. Websites forced underground are more likely to offer extreme material and encourage questionable behavior. Most people using the sites don't get 'locked up'.

"I don't know the truth of that, but the rhetoric to counter that would be that by setting the bar lower you'd endanger younger children even more. You're only thinking of pedophiles but the antis are thinking of children. Why would they agree to bring the age of consent closer to younger children just so that some pedos can stay out of prison by getting it on with older children?"

The aim is to differentiate between 'children' and 'adolescents'. Adolescents are not at significant risk of harm from AMSC. By criminalizing only sex with children, and not with teens, you give pedohebephiles a huge motivation to only have sex with teens and avoid sex with young children.

"It is quite plausible that harm prevention is not the primary reason for AoC laws..."

I think hatred of MAPs and feelings of 'grossness' about teen sex (especially AMSC) are bigger drivers.

"I have no idea what this means. I thought you were saying that criminalizing sex increases risk of harm. I have no idea what you mean by "safety.""

Pharmakon explained it accurately.

"As you mention later, teens are also described as impulsive. Contrasting teens and preteens is interesting up to a point, but it doesn't give the antis any reason to lower the age of consent. They can turn around and just as easily compare teens to full adults and make the same case you make for 18 instead of 12."

From the essay:

A rebuttal, and one that I firmly believe in, is that being allowed to make these decisions is an important part of growing up with a healthy attitude to risk/danger management. Furthermore, it would be better to have a sexual relationship with an adult who has a proper understanding of safe sex and access to contraception, as opposed to a fellow teen who may not know any better. Given the risks of STIs and unwanted pregnancy from unsafe sexual practices, adult-teen sex may actually be safer than teen-teen sex.


"This is an unconvincing comparison. Pointing to a country that's ass backwards on equal rights for women isn't a convincing case to be more like them and tolerate power imbalances."

This is a good rebuttal. I will have to develop a strong counterargument or drop the claim.

"Do you have a citation for this?"

https://wiki.yesmap.net/wiki/Research:_Prevalence#/media/File:Freund.png

"No, it doesn't. You might as well say that group selection supports the idea that idiocy is beneficial simply because it's so common and hasn't been bred out.

Idiocy is a useful trait. Historically and in the present, societies have needed people who will perform menial or dangerous tasks that are necessary for the survival of the group.

"All the more reason to lock us all up."

Most MAPs fly under the radar, and may do something dangerous due to The Push before they're caught.

I appreciate the feedback.

Click the link below to see how my arguments are being presented to the public.
  • (https site) Pro-Reform - Mu Blog Editorial
    [@nonymouse] [Guardster] [Proxify] [Anonymisierungsdienst]

  • Follow ups:

    Post a response:

    Nickname:

    Password:

    Email (optional):
    Subject:


    Message:


    Link URL (optional):

    Link Title (optional):


    Add your sigpic?

    Here are Seven Rules for posting on this forum.

    1. Do not post erotica or overly-detailed sexual discussions.
    2. Do not request, offer, or post links to illegal material, including pictures.
    3. Don't annoy the cogs.
    4. Do not reveal identifying details about yourself or other posters.
    5. Do not advocate or counsel sex with minors.
    6. Do not post admissions of, or accuse others of, potentially illegal activities.
    7. Do not request meetings with posters who are under age 18.

    Posts made to BoyChat are subject to inclusion in the monthly BoyChat Digest. If you do not want your posts archived in the BC Digest, or want specific posts of yours removed after inclusion, please email The BC Digest.