Threaded index     Date index     FAQ


Re: Mu = Umbrella Org

Posted by diogenes on 2024-July-17 15:17:31, Wednesday
In reply to Mu = Umbrella Org posted by BLueRibbon on 2024-July-17 00:19:01, Wednesday

The lowering of the aoc to 12 and the decriminalisation of possession of erotic images of children are both very worthy goals. If the culture shifted enough to enable you to achieve either of these goals, it would certainly enable you to gain all your others, and more; for it would be a revolution.

The goals you mention would require legislation. I simply cannot imagine the 650 MPs in my country voting to legalise the possession of sexy images of children, let alone lower the aoc. Whether this is because of a lack of imagination on my part, or acquaintance with the political realities of my country, I shall leave to the reader to judge.

If you are going to attempt this, however, then I would much rather you seek these goals than the goals of access to mental health care and teaching about 'MAPs' in schools, both of which are likely to have very ambiguous outcomes indeed for us.

It is because these latter goals are deeply ambiguous for us, and do nothing to challenge the abuse narrative, that they would be much easier to achieve than the goals you have described as your main ones. I very much hope that, if you find it impossible to achieve your main goals, you will be able to resist the temptation to switch to the more ambiguous goals simply in order to be able to feel that you have made some modest gain, and haven't been completely wasting your time.

I suppose that it was inevitable that some group or other would ultimately pursue the path of identitarianism in emulation of the gay movement, since it is such an obvious (if, in my opinion, losing) strategy.

I suspect that in 20 years time there may indeed be organisations that will be committed to dealing with 'MAPs' 'humanely' and being concerned with their 'mental health'. But all such concern will be accompanied by shrill pronouncements that the organisations have 'zero tolerance' for any suggestion of adult-minor sex.

So boylovers and their loved and loving boys will continue to be wrenched apart by the state, boylovers will continue to be incarcerated if they cannot 'control' their 'offending', homes will continue to be subject to dawn raids in pursuit of images of sexy kids, and boys will continue to be brainwashed against the men who would otherwise love them.

But the incarcerated boylovers will enjoy improved 'access' to 'mental health professionals' to instill in them the required ideology; and the indoctrination of kids into the belief that being a MAP is a disorder entailing lifelong psychotherapy to avoid horrific 'offending' will begin not in school, but in the nursery.

Maybe I am wrong. Let's hope so.

diogenes

Follow ups:

Post a response:

Nickname:

Password:

Email (optional):
Subject:


Message:


Link URL (optional):

Link Title (optional):


Add your sigpic?

Here are Seven Rules for posting on this forum.

1. Do not post erotica or overly-detailed sexual discussions.
2. Do not request, offer, or post links to illegal material, including pictures.
3. Don't annoy the cogs.
4. Do not reveal identifying details about yourself or other posters.
5. Do not advocate or counsel sex with minors.
6. Do not post admissions of, or accuse others of, potentially illegal activities.
7. Do not request meetings with posters who are under age 18.

Posts made to BoyChat are subject to inclusion in the monthly BoyChat Digest. If you do not want your posts archived in the BC Digest, or want specific posts of yours removed after inclusion, please email The BC Digest.