Threaded index     Date index     FAQ


Was Orwell right?

Posted by Sick Rose on 2024-March-4 20:25:44, Monday
In reply to Holy Shit--More About CJ Hopkins posted by The King of Zembla on 2024-March-4 08:54:58, Monday

You quoted the estimable CJ Hopkins above writing:

"In fact, the entire facade of Regime Truth has fallen into the street, leaving the brutalist exterior of Regime Lies finally exposed. Only the stupid continue, as they struggle around the debris, to exude confidence in official narratives. And who's to say these masses Twittering endlessly aren't in actuality a bot net? We are truly in the Late Soviet period of the Regime and there is no reason any longer to deny it."

This seems undeniable. And there's nothing new about it. Ruling elites over time deteriorate -- among other things, they start believing their own propaganda and can no longer discern reality sufficiently to protect their own positions. This has happened over and over again throughout human history -- in fact, that's what history largely is.

Orwell, however, posited the notion that an elite could seize power and maintain itself in power indefinitely thanks to technology that enabled the elite to maintain 24/7 surveillance -- not simply of what people were doing but of what they were thinking -- that dissident thoughts could be stamped out even before they coalesced to the point where they posed even the most modest challenge to elite control.

The technology at the disposal of our rulers dwarfs that that Orwell could have anticipated. In the era of AI and rule by algorithm, you don't need teams of people laboriously going through yesterday's journals, rewriting them, and consigning offending paper to memory holes.

But Orwell also hinted that technology wasn't enough -- that members of the ruling elite had to be highly intelligent, inculcated with strict discipline that began in childhood -- the intelligence, for example, to grasp instantly where a particular strain of thought might lead and the discipline to cut it off if at any hint of crimethink.

This is where I wonder. Our elites are not exactly stupid but they seem utterly blind -- a kind of trained blindness that you get, for example, from years of immersion in the writings of Judith Butler -- and I really wonder whether the "lunatic technology" at their disposal (to quote Taibbi) is sufficient to protect themselves.

I don't doubt that things are going to get worse -- much worse -- along the lines you (and others such as Hopkins, Taibbi, and Greenwald) have prophesied, that the penalties for thoughtcrime will increase to the point where culprits will face "death lite" to quote our former webmaster.

But will it last forever -- can it? With the trained stupidity that our elites repeatedly demonstrate? The string of failures (Covid, Ukraine, Trump, Gaza, over the last decade) suggest that it's not possible.

Whatever; the next few decades are not going to be fun.

SR
Sick Rose

Follow ups:

Post a response:

Nickname:

Password:

Email (optional):
Subject:


Message:


Link URL (optional):

Link Title (optional):


Add your sigpic?

Here are Seven Rules for posting on this forum.

1. Do not post erotica or overly-detailed sexual discussions.
2. Do not request, offer, or post links to illegal material, including pictures.
3. Don't annoy the cogs.
4. Do not reveal identifying details about yourself or other posters.
5. Do not advocate or counsel sex with minors.
6. Do not post admissions of, or accuse others of, potentially illegal activities.
7. Do not request meetings with posters who are under age 18.

Posts made to BoyChat are subject to inclusion in the monthly BoyChat Digest. If you do not want your posts archived in the BC Digest, or want specific posts of yours removed after inclusion, please email The BC Digest.