The data needs to reflect a complete

different standard and narrative... decoupling from the innuendos and presumptuous ideas that MAP is a condition... that "these people" are hurting, and need to be pitied, allocated resources, and treatment... etc... The data is setting a foundation that solidifies the presumption that erotic energy shared by a male youth 18/16 with some one older or younger is a "condition"... is in need of all these U Students desperatly looking for jobs... The article / research needs to tell a different story that absolves the male youth and any friend he had as a "sex buddy" as being something to be shamed or humiliated and indeed made criminal. That is what "this" is all about! Instead the pity-party here at BC accepts half ass coddling, and endearing phrases that does nothing but make the situation worse. A Trojan Horse sort-a-speak. Demand a clear research statement that categorically admits that sexual energy in boys, dispensed with younger or older friends is not a condition... that this culture is backwards in the over indulgence in victimology, counselling, and humiliating male youth. Let's start seeing this kind of language... and to absolute hell with all these females coming out of University with desires to "save the boys"... save the boys from the very erections that make them pursue the physiological desire to be sexual in the first place.