2 things 1) its his logic. He is the one that is saying 1) the trans person claims he is trans 2) I am not trans , and so cannot know its not true therefore C) his claim is true. which also translates to 1) the unicorn person claims he is unicorn 2) I am not unicorn, and so cannot know its not true therefore C) his claim is true If he accepts the first syllogism, he must accept the 2nd ( or provide reasons for why he doesnt) and 2) Feel free to show me where my logic is incorrect. You just being insulting does not add anything , and certainly doesnt show that I am wrong. I am happy for you to show how I am incorrect. |