There is no such thing as "logic dependent on moralistic views" Either your logic is a rational, sound, and valid argument/syllogism, or it isnt. If it isnt, then its not logic. My logic is sound ( if it is sound) based on the rules of logic. If it is not sound, its because it doesnt follow the laws of logic. There is no such thing as "your" truth or "their" truth or "my" truth. There is only truth , which we may, or may not, know at the time. Logic, reason, is the best way we have to determine the truth. I am not disputing that they may THINK that they are trans, and even FEEL that they are trans ( although I dont see how thats a feeling, feelings are mad/bad/glad/sad and so on) , that does not mean that in reality, what they think or feel, is true. Equally being BLs is our truth I dont know what this means. The definition of a BL is someone who is sexually and possibly emotionally attracted to boys ( although , yes, it can have more nuanced meaning) , I dont know what it means for being a BL to be "my" truth. I am not willing to be a hypocrite or a defeatist moron even though you clearly are willing to be one of them (I'll let you get upset over which one you think I mean). I await your bullshit response to this. I always find it funny, and kind of strange, when people resort to personal insults, when I have never done so. Please point out where I am hypocritical? Or please point out where I am a defeatist moron? |