Threaded index     Date index     FAQ


so the implication of being a pedophile seals it?

Posted by tj on 2012-October-11 22:07:03, Thursday
In reply to I never mentioned prior bad acts. posted by God's Avenging Angel on 2012-October-11 21:50:24, Thursday

Are you suggesting that without a prior bad act, a related conviction which would be inadmissible on its face at any rate, the DA can attach the intent of breaking a child protection law merely by supposition?

I suspect we won't see any convictions on the Azov cases in the USA. They simply are not kP! But we will see many lives ruined. And that's not justice, dude, that's the government using the law to sustain tyranny.

Ask any South African about how the rule of law was used to make every manner and kind of nationalist Afrikaans atrocitiy legal!

lvoe,

tj

Follow ups:

Post a response:

Nickname:

Password:

Email (optional):
Subject:


Message:


Link URL (optional):

Link Title (optional):


Add your sigpic?

Here are Seven Rules for posting on this forum.

1. Do not post erotica or overly-detailed sexual discussions.
2. Do not request, offer, or post links to illegal material, including pictures.
3. Don't annoy the cogs.
4. Do not reveal identifying details about yourself or other posters.
5. Do not advocate or counsel sex with minors.
6. Do not post admissions of, or accuse others of, potentially illegal activities.
7. Do not request meetings with posters who are under age 18.

Posts made to BoyChat are subject to inclusion in the monthly BoyChat Digest. If you do not want your posts archived in the BC Digest, or want specific posts of yours removed after inclusion, please email The BC Digest.