An eye for an eye + the whole world falls in line?

Yeah it's hard to pick which word to use sometimes, as there are pluses and drawbacks to every one. MAPs, boylovers, childlovers, boysexuals, pedophiles, porn addicts, sex offenders. Different labels serve different purposes and if we were just talking about one individual it would be customary to allow them to label themselves (or not) as they choose. The smart move isn't to do like the "gender realists" (or whatever they are calling themselves these days) and go around telling people what label logically applies to them. Not sure if there are many "trannys" who enjoy that nomenclature. Etenne comes to mind as the one who's Facebook friend group of gender nonconforming people might be large enough to include some rough and ready trannys. Hold on, this just in: searching the term up makes it clear that trannys is a porn category! Who knew? Have the Big Booty Latinas shown us the way here too? Is OnlyFans the way? Just kiddin berry, and please don't take this as trying to undermine La Causa's forward momentum. It would be way too easy to poo poo the idea of killing some of them for every one of us they harmed. Some people love that kind of simple brutality. Sounds very zionist. On the topic of eye for an eye mass murder, maybe you noticed that kit has been posting daily examples of children caught up in Jewish attacks. If you have time (and want to be even more discouraged about the moral fiber of your fellow BCers) scroll back a few pages and watch how the same few people show up again and again under kit's posts to point out that these children had it coming due to previous attacks. You Are Not Alone here. Castration has such a bad rap around here and it really shouldn't. Who among us hasn't gotten their pets spayed or neutered? It makes the animal more even tempered and easier to manage. Do you think a castrated steer stands around missing his balls? No! He hangs out with his friends grazing without a care in the world. Wouldn't you like that kind of emotional and mental freedom from stress? Research on humans shows that if a man is castrated prior to the age of 30 he will live an average of 5 years longer. But we love our balls and don't want to lose them, right? As monkey always stupidly says in moments like this, "you first." It's stupid because it misses the point that in every single case (at least here in free America) castration is voluntary. People get it to get rid of testicular cancer, scrotum rot, prostate cancer and other problems. Some people hate the way their balls make them feel and they want the "gas to be drained from their tank." For those who life with their balls is impossible, castration can be a blessing. If those people are choosing that, we should respect their decision. Might violence have some worthwhile uses in other cases? Maybe it might. Again, this is not to undermine anyone's enthusiasm. Often when we are brainstorming a terrible unworkable idea is put on the table right before the actual good idea pops out.