Post a response:
|
The butterfly effect within nature is complex, when you as a society or system of "mental health"/"justice" punish, humiliate, and destroy lives because erotic affections were shared out of an arbitrary line of acceptance, when presumptuous notions of disgust and harm are made mandatory and are met with extreme prejudice, & punishments, that create debilitating life purpose. Then perhaps a theory should be devised as to why such incompetence exists in the social stewardship structure? This paradigm of human existence is so fixated on male sexuality, strange concepts of youthful affections being unwanted, disgusting and damaging etc... etc... when no other evidence, or sex positive alternative can be considered, it should be reminded that this is truly sick! Perhaps that is why this "Uncle Chester" exists? To simply contest and voice concern over the opportunistic damage that unchecked pseudo-science and a "justice system" that grows like a malignant cancer, rewarding the political class that feeds them cash. Ballooning the gap between rich and poor. All that to say, that bits and pieces of the theory of why "Chester" exists is all part of the bigger butterfly effect, why do some boys have a much larger apatite for erotic adventure and sensual stimulus? Social conditions play a huge part of the optics of sexuality... We happen to live in a climate of absolute wealth creation, abundance galore, and a time when drama, hysterics, and the preoccupation of monitoring, and surveillance is at giddy stages. Inventing as much drama and reason to administer social services, and "expertise" to the masses... Where do these outside factors this fit in to the Uncle Chester's theory? It's "debunking"... Things revolve around, evolve, culture is fluent but erotic desire is still just simply a wonderful human experience that has always been used as a political tool. Otherwise erotic discovery, and male youth expected (for many) to seek out sex with Uncle Chester, or Cousin William, or neighbour Jack, or for many with Leo's mom... the point is it's not the Uncle Chester that requires so much scrutiny, rather it's the damaging and opportunistic interventions, and the monetary/salary that is paid to catch and destroy any notion that male youth have the right to be the erotic beings they are. That to me is the true puzzle, and why would such hysterics be so bloated in society? Theories? What could this toxicity it be called? |