|
It would appear that the conversation is "rational" Something is either rational, or it isnt. So it should be easy for you to show that the conversation isnt rational, since you are claiming that what I said isnt rational. But you never do. You just jump straight to bleating "sealion!!!" but his arguments are circular and never go anywhere productive. You cannot give one example of a circular argument I have made. Do you actually know what a circular argument is? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circular_reasoning With monkey, it is classic sealioning over and over. Nope. You say something, I disagree with it, you call me a sealion. How convenient it is for you to bleat "sealion!!!!" rather than address what I said. Its baiting, and all kinds of trolling tactics. You calling it baiting and trolling doesnt make it true This behavior makes me question his motives here. Your initial assumption is wrong, therefore any conclusion you draw from that initial assumption is also wrong. |