Re: pros/cons of the 'pedo' label

i think of dudes as kids of all ages (and sexes), actually. And i am attracted to all kinds of people, but young dudes of the male variety are my heart's main longing, for sure. So, no, i don't think it's "just gay"; it's gay plus BL! But with pizazz!! With ENTHUSIASM FOR LIFE! With POWERSPOTS GALORE! In CHAMPION proportions. Yeah, i go ALL OUT for young dudes! And they go all out for me when we meet in my dreams! (heh) i see the classic definition of 'pedo phile' (child love) but i don't agree with using the word 'child' (which i told myself at age 11 to try not to use when i became a grownup). Nor do i see it as valuable or smart tactically. Since there's a ton of money and effort being put into the idea that "pedophile" equals rape, assault, and all the other worst shit imaginable. Classic propaganda game, is all. Me, i want at least a chance to speak my side of the truth to the vigilante mob if/when it catches up with me (i am very OUT), and i've seen how they just automatically froth at the mouth when they even think of that term. So i go with a homophile icon, Harry Hay, whom said that we should think long on utilizing our OWN name for ourselves, so that WE get to define it, at least until Big Media comes along and does its Lapdog for Statecraft bit. Okay, so you want to go with the word pedo, more power to you. i'm just taking precautions; but i plan to compare the term to the titles of various magazines (for example), like AUDIOPHILE and CINEPHILE! ("Are those people pushing for RAPE OF MUSIC/RAPE OF THE CINEMA???) ===== uP tO oUr imAgiNatiOn how muCh saniTy wE gain!