Post a response:
|
Well, most "boylovers" would find a way to fuck it anyway. Legalizing boy-man sex would be like legalizing drugs and look no further than Seattle or San Francisco or Portland to see how disastrous that turned out. It turned junkies into out-of-control, disrespectful, filthy psychos who turned to bigger crimes to support their habit or because they lost all sense of reality. They couldn't smoke their meth or shoot up their heroin inside the privacy of their tent. They have to do it on the school playground. I could see boylovers being just as stupid. A boylover wouldn't be happy enough to have a pair of preteen boy balls to lawfully lick and suck behind closed doors. They would have to broadcast it and draw attention by doing stupid shit like introducing the boy to drugs. I think the worst thing that a boylover would is drop the boy the minute a boylover can get an upgrade i.e. a real-life female or perv on the boy's female peers. That's really fucked up and totally humiliating for the boy. And believe me, most boylovers aren't even into boys. This forum proves that everyday. The vast majority of boylovers are into boys as a 3rd or 4th choice. Imagine being an 11yo boy who's been in a relationship with an older man since he was 8. This boy looks like Frankie Muniz and can deep throat like a pro. His older friend pours his soul and being into the boy. The boy thrives having a man putting so much love and attention into him. Then one day the older man finds a fay ugly gross female with low standards but is willing to fuck him so the older man dumps the boy. Now the boy becomes an anti and works with Democrats to ban raise the age of consent to 25. |