|
theres no such thing as sexual adultism. No matter how many times you post about it, that doesnt make it a thing. Its not even clear what you mean by sexual adultism. If I had to guess, i would guess that you mean adults do not let children have sex, therefore that is sexual adultism. which is ridiculous. That would be like saying adults do not let children do cocaine, therefore that is cocaine adultism. Would you agree that cocaine adultism is a thing? Just to be clear, I am not saying that sex is the same as taking cocaine. I am saying that calling something adultism simply because children arent allowed to do it is ridiculous. Children are not just small adults. Parents, in general, apply rules or boundaries in order to keep their children safe and help them learn and reach adulthood. Of course, you can disagree with parents about the rules they put in place and how they apply them ( and I often do), but that does not make it an 'ism' to have rules, or for parents to parent. What this is really about is that YOU dont get to have sex with children. But rather than be honest about it, you wrap it up in some weird ideological definition so you can beat other people around the head with a bad word. "No one wants to be a sexual adultist, right?". "Are you some sort of adultist or something?" because of kids being incredibly oppressed parents doing parenting does not mean that kids are being incredibly oppressed. Why are you framing everything in terms of isms and oppression? So sexual adultism needs to be relaxed at least a little for public nudity to be accepted Why does public nudity need to be accepted? |