I didn't think destroying the bourgeois home was anything but a standard part of the 60s revolutionary program. As I said, I agree 50s suburbia was a sterile wasteland in need of change. But pederasts should have looking to HELP, not destroy.
Fags have been satirically opposed to the family since the first Molly Houses in 1700 London – they are a separatist group created to be in opposition to family values. Pederasty evolved to be an integral part of creating good men capable of creating good families.
Here's Tom Reeves from the above-mentioned article:
“Child molestation” really is a code word for the fears of straight men and women that their children may escape the prisons built for them...
The New Right is right: we are after the sons of Straight America. We are on the lookout for them at all times and ever ready to support their first attempts to get free, their need for love and their potential for courage and self-expression. We stand ready to be seduced, and we catch that “please-seduce-me” look in boys’ eyes on street corners, in movie-houses, parks and pinball arcades — yes, even on playgrounds and in classrooms. We assist their jailbreaks from the plastic and poisonous family webs in slums or suburbia, and we let them live with us when possible. There are more boys out there waiting and hoping for this chance than there are men. That makes sense. Fewer boys than men have accepted the boring, safe alternatives. Fewer boys than men have “grown up” and learned to stay on the reservations set aside for sanitary and isolating pleasures (like marriage, dating and gay or singles bars)...
So not only is Tom gonna bust the straight boys out of their bourgeois prisons, he's gonna stop them dating and marrying. Like I said before, I prefer Anita Bryant.
|