Re: Gorton, materialism, and the path ahead

This is nothing but the utterly meaningless drivel of the sort that we are used to from the ethnonationalist cretins like yourself who dominate this forum. The Greens campaigned amongst all religious and ethnic groups. They campaigned amongst white constituents on issues like the cost of living, housing, and energy bills. They also campaigned on Gaza, because the UK government is complicit in genocide, and that makes it a UK issue. And it isn't just Muslims. I am not a Muslim, I am an atheist, and I would vote on the basis of Gaza alone. We should all care about this issue as much as the Muslim community cares. Reform, on the other hand, did not seriously campaign amongst non-whites or Muslims. Why? Because they have actually nothing whatever to offer non-whites and Muslims, except fear and threats. So which of these parties is the more divisive? The one that brings together a coalition from all communities because they have things to appeal to all communities and policies from which people of all religious and ethnic backgrounds can benefit, or the party that can only speak to one ethnicity and one religious background, and then complains that their opponents are "sectarian" and "divisive" for being able to attract people from all backgrounds? And how could a Reform MP represent the whole of the constituency when Reform complain about the ethnic and religious makeup of the electorate that a prospective MP is elected to serve. It goes straight back to Bertolt Brecht. Would it not be simpler to just dissolve the people and elect another? About family voting, the matter should and will be investigated, but the scale of the Green victory was not marginal. The notion that there were thousands of Muslims and ethnic minorities dying to vote for Reform who were coerced by family members into voting for the Greens is nonsense. What Farage could have tweeted after the election was an acknowledgement of his defeat, and then a statement of his concern about allegations of irregularities that should be investigated. Instead he tweeted "This election was a victory for sectarian voting and cheating." thus seeking to delegitimise democracy in the same way that Trump has done over in your country. This is the playbook of fascism, and I am tired of it. My OP was a speculation that a political movement in my country might, if successful, create the preconditions for the enlargement of the Overton window in a way that could ultimately benefit us as pederasts. Perhaps I am mistaken - I'm not completely sure myself - and I expected criticism. It is incredibly disappointing that the only thing that anyone wants to talk about is whether the election was illegitimate because blacks and Asians are part of the electorate. More fool me for thinking that anything else is possible on BC. I shall not waste my time extending this thread any further.