Threaded index     Date index     FAQ


Re: I thought...

Posted by Errant on 2025-December-20 05:30:04, Saturday
In reply to Re: I thought... posted by monkeyLostInHead on 2025-December-19 08:16:14, Friday

"Fully clothed non sexual pictures of children have been classed as CP, or at least used to show that a defendant has a sexual interest in children."

Even so it would still be a picture of an actual child. I would need to read the specifics of such a case, but I imagine this could only apply in conjunction with finding actual child porn in the subject's possession or some other extenuating circumstance like parole conditions which can be quite broad regarding material or behavior that would otherwise be legal for someone not on parole.

But Manstuprator is right to say that Tom Hanks is a red herring. He simply isn't a minor and doesn't even look like one. Whether he "represents" one is besides the point and the term is really just a weasel word introduced by the OP in a questionable attempt to one-up the AI.

Errant

Follow ups:

Post a response:

Nickname:

Password:

Email (optional):
Subject:


Message:


Link URL (optional):

Link Title (optional):


Add your sigpic?

Here are Seven Rules for posting on this forum.

1. Do not post erotica or overly-detailed sexual discussions.
2. Do not request, offer, or post links to illegal material, including pictures.
3. Don't annoy the cogs.
4. Do not reveal identifying details about yourself or other posters.
5. Do not advocate or counsel sex with minors.
6. Do not post admissions of, or accuse others of, potentially illegal activities.
7. Do not request meetings with posters who are under age 18.

Posts made to BoyChat are subject to inclusion in the monthly BoyChat Digest. If you do not want your posts archived in the BC Digest, or want specific posts of yours removed after inclusion, please email The BC Digest.