Post a response:
|
Hi!I haven't be here for a while. In my country (Russia) lgbt movement is still associated with pedophilia by the totalitarian state. Government doesn't differentiate between different kinds of sexual and gender deviance. It means that the state still believes in huge monolithic construct of "non traditional sexuality and gender identity" outside traditional russian values (it is official term of Russian law -- "nontraditional sexual relationships" which includes all sexual and gender variations outside heterosexuality, it is doubtful construct, because in the history of Russia there are lot of people, different cultures, different traditions of sexual relationships). I think that in the West back in the 70s there was also such huge construct of "sexual deviance and "perversion" and it became controlled, fractured, partly gentrificated. Western states understood back in the days that they couldn't do anything against such huge monolithic and dangerous construct of sexual deviance (which can be linked to madness, but it is not madness, it has other role and structure in the culture, but it can be in some respect a greater threat) and it started to fracture it, to normalize it, to neutralize it. In fact VirPed is a continuation of this process. The dream of VirPed is a pedophile under the control of medical and psychological authorities, who express his sexuality under psychological supervision. It is interesting that I was such trans woman under medical and psychological supervision in Russian state and I wanted to be normalized, but I decided that it is better to exist parallel to the state without contacts with medical and psychological authorities, that I don't want to be "normal" trans woman who lives according to "traditional values". I think that the best strategy of pedophiles is to cut contact with medical and psychological authorities altogether. It is the best form of resistance in the current climate. Also it is important to create alternative knowledge about pedophilia. I think that Tom o'Carroll's strategy was right when he wrote books. Such knowledge can be a foundation of new science with new understanding of childhood sexuality and maybe such knowledge can even facilitate the development of new culture. |