ME: >>That's why men want to get boys out of the clutches of women as early as possible, so that boys can learn to be men, and not be left feminized by their mothers. YOU: >So we are worried boys will wind up having better hearing, blinking more often, being too clean and too sociable, and not inventing enough stuff? These differences are genetically determined. We couldn't change them even if we wanted to. >Worst defense of the "male group" thesis ever. I think that it's a good defense of the "male group" thesis. >Plus he is arguing these differences are rooted in evolutionary biology. That's nature, not nurture. So even talking about boys being feminized by their mothers is completely at odds with his theory of where these differences come from. Yes, I see your point. There appears to be a contradiction. But I believe that boys can become confused when their expression of their biological (DNA determined) characteristics are frustrated by attempts by females to make boys more closely resemble females. So that validates my statement: >>That's why men want to get boys out of the clutches of women as early as possible, so that boys can learn to be men, and not be left feminized by their mothers.Mothers, and female schoolteachers, often try to raise boys to be like well-behaved girls. But boys will be boys. And that, I believe, is the way things should be. It sounds like you don't agree... M. SEE: 50 REAL Differences Between Menīš Women(link) https://www.boychat.org/messages/1643472.htm |