Threaded index     Date index     FAQ


WARNING: Stupic Post by Ignorant Person!

Posted by Manstuprator on 2025-May-16 00:33:26, Friday
In reply to WARNING: Graphic depictions of dead children posted by VulcanBomber on 2025-May-15 08:57:58, Thursday

Uh, what do you think, "...and it's not pretty" meant?

You know, guy, that was just a fictional movie. No children were harmed in the making of it. Really!

The movie does make you think a little. If you KNEW that a boy had killed others, and that he was about to kill you, would you kill the boy first? I would...

But it makes you so, so upset...

Yeah, the (pretended) "violence" is quite graphic. When I watch it, I think to myself, "Neat special effect! I wonder how they did THAT!"

But you thought that it was all real.

Wow. Just wow...

Here's a tip: when someone suggests that you watch a film, or read a book, do a little Googling first. Check goodreads.com for book reviews, and read the Wikipedia articles on the films. You can just scan the article really fast, to avoid details that could "spoil" the film ending.

Ah, but why try to educate someone as ignorant as you? I must be pretty stupid to waste my time trying, don't you agree?

And the BoyLover code of ethics, by Dragonlover, is a lot of crap, too.


A Boylove Code of Ethics (by Dragonlover)
"Every man who has an innate love of boys is not necessarily qualified to be a boylover. The role of a boylover in a young boy's life is one of immense responsibility, very much akin to that of a father. The boy's best interest, and his future as well as present well being, must always be of paramount importance to the boylover.

Even in Ancient Greece, where boylove was the norm for several centuries, the boylover was expected to be a man of high moral character. Indeed, it brought shame on the boy and his family if his erastes (lover) was anything less.

Because a man/boy relationship involves two people who love one another, boylove encompasses the entire spectrum of human emotion. Therefore, the sexual aspect is a part of most man/boy relationships, even if that aspect is never consumated. It follows, then, that any boylove code of ethics will deal with the issue of sex in the relationship in a mature and responsible way.

1 - A boylover should do everything possible to protect his young friend from any harm, including exposure or embarrassment from arrest. This could mean abstaining from fully consensual sexual relations if such is illegal in the state or country where the boylover lives.

2 - A boylover should protect his own reputation, so that his young friends will not be hurt or suffer as a result of association with him.

3 - A boylover must be truthful and honest, and never lie to his young friends.

4 - A boylover should not seek intimate contact with a boy, without knowing and understanding the boy's interests and feelings.

5 - Intimacy with a boy should never develop into a sexual relationship without the boy fully consenting and understanding the social, legal, and health implications of the relationship.

6 - Boys should not be treated as sexual objects to be enjoyed at the whim of a boylover.

7 - A boylover must respect the role and authority of a boy's parents and not seek to undermine that role.

8 - A boylover should not provide his young friends with alcohol or drugs, and certainly will never use drugs to weaken a boy's sexual inhibitions, or "to get him into the mood" for sexual intimacy.

9 - A boylover has the responsibility of encouraging and helping a boy to develop his normal heterosexual tendencies, unless the boy confirms that he has an innate homosexual orientation.

10 - A boylover should guide and encourage his young friends to stay in school, avoid crime, and do all he can do to help them to develop a successful career.

11 - A boylover should not "cruise" to pick up strange boys for sexual encounters, because that encourages boys to "hustle" or prostitute themselves.
I suppose that you agree with all the above, right? Yeah, stupid, aren't you?

Though I do agree partially with some of the above -- it's not all bullshit. Just a lot of it.

Oh, and how would your little magazine project be going, if not for all the useful suggestions I made about improving it, which you then followed?

NOTE TO THE READER: If you don't know about the previous posts made by this poster in response to posts that I've made in the past, you may think--from reading the above--that I'm some kind of jerk, when the reality is that HE'S the jerk. I'm just giving him a bit of "shock treatment" here. So, don't jump to conclusions about something when you know nothing of the history behind it. That's a very dumb thing to do!

M.
"Stupic Post by Ignorant Person!" That describes you perfectly! But why, oh why, do I bother responding at all?

If regarding some parts of this post I'm confusing you with someone else, I apologize. ;-)

https://www.boywiki.org/en/BoyLovers%27_codes_of_ethics


Follow ups:

Post a response:

Nickname:

Password:

Email (optional):
Subject:


Message:


Link URL (optional):

Link Title (optional):


Add your sigpic?

Here are Seven Rules for posting on this forum.

1. Do not post erotica or overly-detailed sexual discussions.
2. Do not request, offer, or post links to illegal material, including pictures.
3. Don't annoy the cogs.
4. Do not reveal identifying details about yourself or other posters.
5. Do not advocate or counsel sex with minors.
6. Do not post admissions of, or accuse others of, potentially illegal activities.
7. Do not request meetings with posters who are under age 18.

Posts made to BoyChat are subject to inclusion in the monthly BoyChat Digest. If you do not want your posts archived in the BC Digest, or want specific posts of yours removed after inclusion, please email The BC Digest.