Post a response:
|
and academia at large still believe it, and indoctrinate it into their pseudo sciences, why do they choose a certain narrative of investigation, but close all doors on other considerations? Why should funding be the path of science, social truth, and criminal punishment the accepted narrative when so many possibilities in human interaction are possible? When erotic pleasure, affection, attention, is such a big part of the overall being of being young, male, and human? It's time in my estimation that whole lot of people start thinking like you. Why? Because brutal punishment, and destroyed lives are the alternative. It seems that at least a modicum of social standards would have changed these past 50 years in sexual acceptance, understanding, and celebration when it comes to academia and it's recommendations on how to view male youthful sex desires? Such dishonesty, and academic shoddiness that borderlines criminality, when young males face such treacherous consequences, for something that is naturally beholding to them to experience, and achieve. at some point it becomes redundant to continuously harp on this, because it is clear true scientific facts, and sanity is not what modern day academics are about. It's about preserving all the narratives that are proving to be failures. Such costly investments, looking to monetize drama and hysterics. Universities are not accountable, who would look into this? The corporations that fund them? That determine what's needed in the way of new discoveries to be profitable? You know I'm not looking to offend, only to truly make observations that I don't and will never understand. It takes me right back to the purpose of human existence. To simply be cruel to one another, scapegoat and harm so that some can lambaste themselves in mass public cheer? Young males lives destroyed, and used as a collateral damage. You tel me? Why hasn't more change occurred? Doesn't the fact that week after week young males getting into the same sexual trouble mean something? Is it that society is just void of having purpose, so it attacks as a way of finding a collective meaning? and isn't that a bit psychotic or rabid? Good Chat, thanks for responding. |