Oh no, newcomers will be fooled into keeping their dicks in their pants around children! God forbid newbies get mislead into focusing on stable community oriented law abiding forms of child loving with the parent's full knowledge and support! What are the child molesters who slip their hands down a kid's pants the moment they get out from under their parent's supervision going to think? Isn't it better to focus on the positive and honestly relate to kids out in the open, without fear that they will tell on you? Especially those dealing with younger children, isn't it selfish and dangerous to try to teach them body positivity and sexual freedom while at the same time getting it through their little minds that they can not tell even their closest friend or even their parents or favorite school teacher about their experiences? Where are the lies? Who is misleading? Sure you want to talk about how religion and culture are unfair to the pedophile who is barred from getting his sexual needs met. Maybe in some far off place or time it was normal for adults to play with toddler's dicks and some imagine how hawt and sexy that would be, but we don't live in that type of backwards primitive society, and in no society anywhere has it ever been accepted for grown men to molest little kids. "But lets focus on the 17 and a half year olds," Jessy moans. Maybe he has a point there, but the law is like it is for a reason. It's due to 30 and 40 year olds leading them into temptation and corrupting their morals. Society has no problem with older teens dating people in their own age range, but the potential for abuse between people of vastly unequal experience, money and power has caused problems often enough over the years that societies all over the world have made laws to protect teens. But even if it was legal for grown men to fuck teens that has nothing to do with the pedophiles who want to molest little kids. Where are the misleading lies? Sure you want to have a conversation about how society, culture, laws and taboos are based on treating children as property and should be updated for the modern age, but that's a complicated subject. If we've got 20 year olds coming here trying to figure out how to live life as a moral and responsible boylover and they get drawn into one of Mansturprator's (or one of the sock puppy's) defenses of man/boy sex, with no mention of the probable harmful consquences, then isn't BC kind of responsible when that young boylover gets radicalized into a child molesting pedophile? This has been a huge problem with BC for years, as noted by tpka "Newport" who broke the news here that tpka "Spongebob" had been groomed by online predators at 20 years old into activities that led to heartache. Was the recent conversation about the SpongeBob situation "misleading?" What's misleading is people who continue to come to BC year after year with occasional new nicknames, promoting the same consequence free narrative of adult child sex. "This report was timely in that we currently have ({}) trying to convince others that many boys willingly want sex with men. ({}) never mentions the possible consequences of doing so and likes to project it as a normal, happy and every day occurrence. Putting aside any moralities of the pro vs con debate about having sex with boys, is everything that Cardenas and of course Matthew have been through really worth it?" That's a quote from Newport, but the same could be said today and it's usually left to the hateful devil tpka "Tyred" to remind readers of what the pro-c pedophiles are leaving out of the equation. 'SpongeBob' perpetrator gets 35 years Posted by Newport News on 2012-August-16 07:22:02, Thursday You need to wise up SiB. Not everything here on BC is as it seems to you. Tpka "Wheel" might not be using that nickname any longer, but he's no more gone from boychat than is Lil "mark914." Open your eyes and read between the lines and you'll see both the old friends who you miss and the old predators who change their names but never their narratives. |