Post a response:
|
John Holt's post was obviously not meant to be interpreted literally. I don't know what point he was actually trying to make. But not all violence is terrorism. Getting a group of MAPs together to pretend to be looking for sex with an underage boy or girl, then going there to beat the hell out of the vigilantes? That would be violent, but it wouldn't be terrorism. I think one of the major reasons terrorism causes such revulsion is the targeting of random people. That's hard to properly justify. I'd say that terrorism is morally wrong and counterproductive. Fighting back physically against vigilantes? That's a different story. Eventually, some young MAP is going to snap. It's only a matter of time, and community leaders will be powerless to stop it. Who will be more morally culpable? The state's bad actors, or rogue MAPs? [@nonymouse] [Guardster] [Proxify] [Anonymisierungsdienst] |