No, just suitably hot

Biology ensures the propagation of the species. But it does not care how much abuse of the unwilling takes place in the process. Nonsense. Biology arranges for the survival of the fittest. Ask yourself which of these two tribes is most likely to flourish and compete successfully with others for food and other necessities. Tribe A, where the men rape whoever they feel like and fight and kill each other over women and boys, while the women and boys live in terror of them and the women have children by rapists. Or tribe B, where the men compete to win the hearts of the women and boys by striving to demonstrate their best attributes, their virtues and their ability and willingness to nurture and protect, where the boys learn from lovers they have chosen because they worship them and the women have babies by men they love who are committed to helping and protecting them and their mutual offspring. Boys are not "too" hot. They are just as hot as they need to be to attract the right amount of attention from men who might otherwise not find time for them. Nature is a balancing act. Most men balance erotic longing with other considerations. Those that get the balance badly wrong, eg. rapists, are not natural; they are disfunctional. Unfortunately, nature comes up with a few faulty products. There is no reason to condone feminism or other noxious modern ideologies in order to pretend that historically men have tended to behave like monsters. It has always been fairly easy and natural for men to have a variety of aspirations besides the sexual and to balance them for the good of all. I'm astonished to find you of all people hiding behind the myth of creation by God in order to pretend evolutionary function hasn't existed. www.amazon.com/dp/1481222112