Threaded index     Date index     FAQ


Re: Right on cue, more dishonest trolling

Posted by Tyred on 2024-June-28 20:35:33, Friday
In reply to Right on cue, more dishonest trolling posted by mark194 on 2024-June-28 19:25:42, Friday

Be reasonable. We all have gmail accounts, so it's nothing so serious as to be considered "caught red handed" to admit to using gmail to have harmless conversations with harmless, positive friends. Now talking to child molesters, trading child pornography or other highly sensitive conversations is a completely different matter. The choice of which email service to use depends on the needs of each user and it is up to each individual to do their research and decide which service is most appropriate for them. Hopefully all of us keep on learning our entire lives and the really shameful confession would be to admit to not having learned anything in two years.

You can keep on repeating the line that you posting your email address on almost all of your BC posts, while at the same time claiming to be a teenager, wasn't catfishing. Maybe it wasn't. No one knows but the poor saps who fell for it, but the fact still remains that all visitors to BC and any other pedo topic sites should be very cautious about getting in touch with a person claiming to be an underage minor. That point still stands irregardless of if this particular person claiming to be a teen actually was one or not. You have shown yourself to be extremely manipulative, vindictive and hateful (calling people "subhuman fuck," hijacking many multiple threads to inject your poison, etc), so people can take that into consideration when deciding if they want to take you up on your offer.

As far as the watermarking of pictures with the recipient's personal numbers, that was for the very narrow situation of sending personal pictures to someone that you know intimately, such as a friend or relative. The rationale was that a person would be less likely to post a private picture to social media if that meant sharing their own private information too. It's not a matter of not trusting someone, but more a matter of making it very clear with the person that you don't want them to share your private pictures. Even people that you trust today, such as a dating partner, might not be respectful of your wishes not to have your pictures posted publicly. The fact that you can't comprehend any scenario outside of the picture trading forums that you are accustomed to doesn't mean that other people's techniques for increasing personal privacy are nonsensical, but even if they were, that was just a one off brainstorming idea thrown out in a passing conversation two years ago and not meant to be reflective of anyone's actual photo privacy management program in particular. If the idea doesn't make sense for you then don't use it!

Why are you working so hard to hijack this thread to weave a narrative of gloom and doom? It's a big world and sooner or later you need to learn that not everyone is going to like you or trust that you are who you claim to be. When you go on and on with these massive years-long over reactions to being called out, it just makes you look that much more guilty of being the mentally unwell middle aged loser that you come off as.
Tyred

Follow ups:

Post a response:

Nickname:

Password:

Email (optional):
Subject:


Message:


Link URL (optional):

Link Title (optional):


Add your sigpic?

Here are Seven Rules for posting on this forum.

1. Do not post erotica or overly-detailed sexual discussions.
2. Do not request, offer, or post links to illegal material, including pictures.
3. Don't annoy the cogs.
4. Do not reveal identifying details about yourself or other posters.
5. Do not advocate or counsel sex with minors.
6. Do not post admissions of, or accuse others of, potentially illegal activities.
7. Do not request meetings with posters who are under age 18.

Posts made to BoyChat are subject to inclusion in the monthly BoyChat Digest. If you do not want your posts archived in the BC Digest, or want specific posts of yours removed after inclusion, please email The BC Digest.