Post a response:
|
Being able to have sex whenever and with whomever, has made making a family much less desirable. You dont need a stable relationship any more to have sex. ... There is no need to be a good person, since you will always find someone willing to have sex with you for one night, no matter how fucked up you are. ... There has been an explosion in single moms, and single parent households are terrible for children. Firstly, people always have a choice. If they want a family, then they can look for those partners who want the same. Secondly, free sex reduces the likelihood of violence, because you can always find someone who wants sex. Thirdly, modern means of contraception make it possible to avoid becoming a single mother, The problem is that in the United States sex education is aimed at abstinence which increases the likelihood unplanned pregnancies occur. As Mary Harrington argues, contraception is not 100% effective, so the increased number of sexual encounters will increase the chance of conception, which in turn will increase the numbers of unwanted children, exactly the opposite effect to what you wanted. This is effective with timely and correct sex education. As a result of destructive feminism, people began not only to receive inappropriate sex education aimed at abstinence, but they are also afraid of sex, afraid of men. When the state tells a woman that if she becomes pregnant, she must give birth, it takes away her choice and thereby can ruin the life of both her and the unwanted child. I think somewhere around here the other day I read about the success of Finnish sex education, which has reduced violence and the number of unplanned pregnancies |