Are you reading an entirely different post?

My entire point is engage with social norms and meanings, or ignore them at your peril. And that identity labels such as the "psychopath" and "homosexual" are constructed as a relation to existing norms. Fragility describes the state of all social currency, but particularly these identities that come and go. Pedophile has existed since when? Identities fulfill a function in relation to a less mutable normative trend - i.e. they exist for categorization of individuals. Merely shaking your fists and attacking the underlying norm to "liberate" your own adopted identity is a vain and impotent pursuit. You could do it by completely destroying an entire frame of reference such as sexuality. But why? You could ask people to become more gay or more sociopathic until there was no norm. But why? You could do it by exporting the mentally handicapped to a distant planet and breed them into a new society... You could claim to destroy the norm by asking for more "visibility", "understanding" and "facts", by doing "science" and "human rights", but these are in fact normative, relational pursuits. Which makes them eminently viable, IMO.