Don't misconstrue what I said. I'm not. Please point out anywhere I've mischaracterized anything you've said. All you are arguing is that "it seems to you" Not really; I'm arguing that this is what you actually said - anyone other than myself can see the implication I'm talking about. In other words, our exchange so far is sort of like this: You: I went to the store with a bucket, and I came home from the store without a bucket. Me: It sounds like you left the bucket at the store. You: What? Don't misconstrue what I said. All I said is that I went to the store with a bucket and came home without a bucket. Read what I said in plain english and it's clear I didn't mention leaving the bucket at the store at all. You're just arguing that it "seemed to you" that I left the bucket at the store. Why are you so obsessed with leaving buckets at places? Do you see how that's kind of silly? The point about sex being a natural thing is unrelated and I wrote it as a reaction to monkey, and now you, being obsessed about sex. Ok. In context, though, it seemed - not just to me but to any reasonable person - like this was further implying that you were referring to sex when complaining about not being able to express your love to boys. |