Post a response:
|
What you describe, Manstrupator, is certainly a reality, but it is only one aspect of the complexity at play. The bigger picture is the mish-mash being made of gender/sex itself. Lial makes this point: the logic you describe is incomplete. It describes just one dynamic, when in fact there are not only many dynamics, but so many that it's all a big mish-mash, a confused acid-trip, an exercise in incoherence. As if (for example) being a "trans bisexual woman" could mean anything at all without the very metaphysics of gender that the trans mish-mash disavows! So yes, there are those for whom "trans" is a "solution" to the "problem" of homosexuality (this is especially strong in Muslim countries such as Iran, if I understand correctly), and this is pretty abhorrent. But much worse is the case of those for whom "trans" is a "solution" to the "problem" of being a human being incarnate. |