Threaded index     Date index     FAQ


No room at the inn for transkids

Posted by Pharmakon on 2024-April-18 10:03:00, Thursday
In reply to Pathologizing youth agency posted by Pharmakon on 2024-April-16 13:20:16, Tuesday

The more I read about the Cass Review, the less I like it. Our community should better than anyone understand that safetyism is how conformists justify their oppression of those who are different.

Even if we grant -- and I don't -- that gay boys (as Sullivan claims) or anyone else are being somehow "transed," how does this justify denying puberty blockers and hormone replacement therapy to all young people -- even, potentially, up to age 25? But this is what Cass seems to suggest.

There are actual transkids, right? Unless you take the position that being trans is just a delusion, something that needs to be fixed, how can you insist that a transgirl be forced to undergo male puberty, or a transboy female puberty, when the means exist to avoid it?

As one critic points out, the Cass Review even suggests more needs to be done to prevent little boys and girls from identifying as the "wrong" gender, on the basis that acceptance of social transition is a kind of gateway drug to trans:

The recommendation to bring social transition within the purview of clinical opinion, rather than respecting it as a personal decision, amounts to serious medical overreach that goes against the World Health Organization’s (2019) recognition that gender incongruence is not a disorder. By making clinicians the arbiters of people’s identities and behaviours, it violates people’s freedoms and their rights to autonomy, privacy, and self-determination. Furthermore, it potentially enables harmful conversion therapy practices....


In an insightful piece linked below, Jules Gill-Peterson observes:

The history of “child protection” in the United States is a litany of racist and, in some cases, openly genocidal state projects: the removal of Indigenous children from their kinship networks for abuse in the residential school system; the creation of what Dorothy Roberts calls “family policing,” through which the federal government and state governments have waged political war on the Black family by calling it child welfare; and the child separation policy practiced by US immigration officials.


While some of us seem to think trans liberation has gone too far, Gill-Peterson argues hasn't gone far enough and that trans needs to move beyond its reliance on family and doctors to fend off the impulse of the state to impose conformity:

Protection is a desperate attempt to produce the veneer of trans inclusion as progress while avoiding the genuine challenge of letting trans people transition simply because that is what they want. The logic of protection is not new, but it is today proving its ultimate futility. It not only fails to stop the restriction of medical transition because it has no collective vision or demand, just a series of private individuals upon whom the state shall not infringe (until it inevitably does). Worse, protecting trans people only if they repair the private family, and only if they submit to the authority of medicine, offers an uncompelling cause to fight for.


We should know better than to turn to the state to protect us from the threat of "Big Trans." The Sex Police are not, in this case any more than in any other, our friends.

hugzu ;-p

ThesisAntithesisSynthesisNormAdjacency
Sex is good
Rape culture
Feminism
Gender
Sex workers
Boys decide
Grooming
Youth liberation
Age
Transboys/Tomboys
No sex police
The nanny state
Anarchism
Identity
RSOs/SVPs

Click on the table for a larger version and brief explanation

Pharmakon
  • (https site) Jules Gill-Peterson, The Logic of Protection
    [@nonymouse] [Guardster] [Proxify] [Anonymisierungsdienst]

  • Follow ups:

    Post a response:

    Nickname:

    Password:

    Email (optional):
    Subject:


    Message:


    Link URL (optional):

    Link Title (optional):


    Add your sigpic?

    Here are Seven Rules for posting on this forum.

    1. Do not post erotica or overly-detailed sexual discussions.
    2. Do not request, offer, or post links to illegal material, including pictures.
    3. Don't annoy the cogs.
    4. Do not reveal identifying details about yourself or other posters.
    5. Do not advocate or counsel sex with minors.
    6. Do not post admissions of, or accuse others of, potentially illegal activities.
    7. Do not request meetings with posters who are under age 18.

    Posts made to BoyChat are subject to inclusion in the monthly BoyChat Digest. If you do not want your posts archived in the BC Digest, or want specific posts of yours removed after inclusion, please email The BC Digest.