Threaded index     Date index     FAQ


Re: ''personal anecdotes do not make a data set''???

Posted by monkeyLostInHead on 2024-April-4 12:50:32, Thursday
In reply to ''personal anecdotes do not make a data set''??? posted by Manstuprator on 2024-April-4 12:28:17, Thursday

Usually I ignore the contradictions/errors in your post

What contradictions/errors? Oh, I contradicted an aphorism? oh no!
So what errors have I posted, exactly?

The original aphorism, by the political scientist Ray Wolfinger

I dont really care what the original aphorism was. Its irrelevant.


You know, I can also google, and come up with things that support what I am saying.

for example

When compared to other types of evidence, anecdotal evidence is generally regarded as limited in value due to a number of potential weaknesses, but may be considered within the scope of scientific method as some anecdotal evidence can be both empirical and verifiable, e.g. in the use of case studies in medicine. Other anecdotal evidence, however, does not qualify as scientific evidence, because its nature prevents it from being investigated by the scientific method. Where only one or a few anecdotes are presented, there is a larger chance that they may be unreliable due to cherry-picked or otherwise non-representative samples of typical cases.[2][3] Similarly, psychologists have found that due to cognitive bias people are more likely to remember notable or unusual examples rather than typical examples.[4] Thus, even when accurate, anecdotal evidence is not necessarily representative of a typical experience. Accurate determination of whether an anecdote is typical requires statistical evidence.[5] Misuse of anecdotal evidence in the form of argument from anecdote is an informal fallacy[6] and is sometimes referred to as the "person who" fallacy ("I know a person who..."; "I know of a case where..." etc.) which places undue weight on experiences of close peers which may not be typical.

And this is my point. While it may be enough to convince Etenne ( although it shouldnt be ), his story about his time in a gay bar is no where near convincing enough to make me believe what he is saying because its an unverified anecdote from someone I dont know, making a strong claim about something that he has not shown to be true. It lacks verification and its likely cherry picked or misreported or misremembered. Etennes story is not scientific evidence.

Do you believe etennes claim purely on the basis of what he said about working in a gay bar? I dont.

I am glad that you would believe in ghosts if someone told you they had seen a ghost though.



For an "expert" logician, you often seem quite ignorant...

I have never claimed to be an expert.

This is the real reason you posted. So you could get your little digs in. Unfortunately you have not shown that I am ignorant. You have just shown that you like posting ad hominems.

Follow ups:

Post a response:

Nickname:

Password:

Email (optional):
Subject:


Message:


Link URL (optional):

Link Title (optional):


Add your sigpic?

Here are Seven Rules for posting on this forum.

1. Do not post erotica or overly-detailed sexual discussions.
2. Do not request, offer, or post links to illegal material, including pictures.
3. Don't annoy the cogs.
4. Do not reveal identifying details about yourself or other posters.
5. Do not advocate or counsel sex with minors.
6. Do not post admissions of, or accuse others of, potentially illegal activities.
7. Do not request meetings with posters who are under age 18.

Posts made to BoyChat are subject to inclusion in the monthly BoyChat Digest. If you do not want your posts archived in the BC Digest, or want specific posts of yours removed after inclusion, please email The BC Digest.