1. AI generated CP that cannot be attributed to a living person should be legal by default everywhere drawings are legal. It would basically end the problem of CP now and forever, since 99% of boylovers would choose that over dealing with the hassles of the real thing. But instead of reaching this sensible conclusion, AI CP is being sold as the latest grave threat to humanity, like the child sex doll epidemic we're all supposed to be panicking about, but which harms no one except the sensibilities of sadistic women who aren't so much interested in protecting children as they are in hurting men.
2. AI provides us with a great power to generate a lot of imagery at little cost, in either time or money. It makes it possible for a minority that is so poor or unpopular that it lacks access to the services of artists, to create interesting content for their communities. It's not restricted to erotic imagery. I'm thinking of logos, story illustrations, and other design elements that we cannot rely upon others to produce for us.
3. AI is being constrained from producing the relevant imagery, though I'm not well appraised on the moment to moment updates on that. Even if public AI is constrained, individuals will be able to setup and train their own private image generators, and produce whatever they like. The technology is already good enough for most purposes, so locking down the existing technology doesn't take that away. However, people will still need to gain access to the unrestricted technology, and that is where censorship will establish itself: banning unrestricted technologies as a dangerous threat to public order, just as New Zealand banned videos from the Christchurch mass shooting. | |
From his Throne,
The King of Zembla
|
