The whole page just seems like an exercise in anti-contact virtue signaling, though I am pleased to say that they did not misrepresent my argument about how transkid activism has really been a form of child protectionism wholly compatible with the anti-contact protectionist stance on sex. I'm also glad they aren't lumping me in with the masculinists. But characterizing any of that as transphobic is such a transparent falsehood that it's hard to take this "Iris" character seriously. Obviously this whole "MAP-wiki" thing is an effort at identitarian gentrification. I mean, they're even castigating Newgon for criticizing "zoosadism pride." These are Leftists who are so far-gone that you can't even say anything negative about sadists who derive pleasure from animal cruelty if it's sanctified as an "identity." Everyone should ignore these people and whatever pressure they might mount against other pedo-sites. |