Threaded index     Date index     FAQ


Too US-centric and Deterministic

Posted by Queer Furry on 2023-December-5 06:45:34, Tuesday
In reply to Pharmakon's got GAME posted by Pharmakon on 2023-December-4 16:19:38, Monday

"Mirkin sets the stage by explaining how movements emerge. Initially, oppressed groups face the “battle to prevent the battle”: they “are not heard by the dominant society,” drowned out by a strong consensus that an alternative to the existing system is not just undesirable but unthinkable. Overcoming this is a bottom-up process in which the most oppressed layers of the group come together, begin to organize, and find ways (Stonewall, for example) of forcing public recognition of their “right to make political claims.” This does not guarantee such claims will succeed; it only forces the dominant society to confront and debate them."

Mirkin's explanation certainly has some value, but it appears to be unable to explain the emergence of at least some movements of discriminated people.

To even just take an example of a country that's relatively similar to the US: (West) Germany.

"[...] how legalization [of sex between men 21 years and older] came about in the Bundestag: It was based on the model of 13 European criminal laws and on the advice of doctors, psychologists, lawyers and the Protestant and Catholic churches. So it was probably old, white, heterosexual men who supported this reform. [...] This important criminal law reform apparently fell out of the sky for the gays in western Germany - without their own initiative and without demonstrable involvement." (translated by Google)
https://www.queer.de/detail.php?article_id=33754

"[...] fear of declining birth rate no longer controlled the 1960s and homosexual men were no longer seen as a threat for not being able to reproduce. The role of the state was seen as protecting society from harm, and should only intervene in cases that involved force or the abuse of minors. On 25 June 1969 [...] Paragraph 175 was reformed, in that only the "qualified cases" that were previously handled in §175a – sex with a man less than 21 years old, homosexual prostitution, and the exploitation of a relationship of dependency (such as employing or supervising a person in a work situation) – were retained. Paragraph 175b (concerning bestiality) also was removed."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paragraph_175

"The first kiss between two men on German television was shown in Rosa von Praunheim's film It Is Not the Homosexual Who Is Perverse, But the Society in Which He Lives (1971). This film marks the beginning of the German modern gay liberation movement."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBT_rights_in_Germany#West_Germany_(1949%E2%80%931990)

"The film was an emancipatory call for homosexuals to organize and fight for their freedom. It Is Not the Homosexual Who Is Perverse ... triggered the modern gay rights movement in Germany and Switzerland and also found great resonance internationally."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/It_Is_Not_the_Homosexual_Who_Is_Perverse,_But_the_Society_in_Which_He_Lives

To summarize, there was no publicly visible gay movement in West Germany after WW II, at least according to Wikipedia. In 1969, most adult gay sex was nevertheless legalized. The reason was not a movement, but shifting public perspectives on the role of the state as well as other factors. This legalization then probably helped to make the publication of Praunheim's movie possible. Wikipedia and others claim it to be the start of the modern gay movement, but I assume there're likely scholars who'd be skeptical of the ability of a single movie to start a whole movement.

To briefly look at an example that's perhaps a bit less similar to the US: Russia.

If - as Mirkin claims - a movement is always started by the most oppressed people, then shouldn't Russia's queer movement be very accepting of pedophiles at the moment? After all, Russia's queer movement is not assimilated at all into society, similar to how the queer movement of the US wasn't assimilated in previous decades (and presumably was in contrast to Russia's current queer movement much more tolerant towards pedos). Of course, one likely reason for the lack of acceptance is that Russia's queer movement hopes to receive support from e.g. the US. If they supported pedos, this hope for support would vanish. It seems Mirkin's model lacks a consideration of international mechanics like that.

From a postmodern perspective, one could maybe describe Mirkin's explanation as an attempt to create a metanarrative for the emergence of movements. Obviously, from a postmodernist standpoint things are always much more chaotic and unpredictable than a single metanarrative might suggest.

Follow ups:

Post a response:

Nickname:

Password:

Email (optional):
Subject:


Message:


Link URL (optional):

Link Title (optional):


Add your sigpic?

Here are Seven Rules for posting on this forum.

1. Do not post erotica or overly-detailed sexual discussions.
2. Do not request, offer, or post links to illegal material, including pictures.
3. Don't annoy the cogs.
4. Do not reveal identifying details about yourself or other posters.
5. Do not advocate or counsel sex with minors.
6. Do not post admissions of, or accuse others of, potentially illegal activities.
7. Do not request meetings with posters who are under age 18.

Posts made to BoyChat are subject to inclusion in the monthly BoyChat Digest. If you do not want your posts archived in the BC Digest, or want specific posts of yours removed after inclusion, please email The BC Digest.