Post a response:
|
I don't live a sterile life at all. During my hiatus from MAP advocacy, I pursued a career in a child-related field which I continue to this day. I see the same boys every day at work. You can hug boys and let them sit in your lap where I live. You just need to have some self-control. A lot of the arguments I made back in in the 00s focused on two main issues. The first was that not all pedophiles molest children. The second was that possession of child pornography should be decriminalized because its possession didn't encourage production and could be a useful outlet for non-contact MAPs. B4U-Act pushed the academic community hard on the first point, and young MAPs took it to social media with a degree of success. The second point was too radical and failed, but it is worth pursuing again with all the interest in generative AI. In my 15 year hiatus, having known thousands and thousands of boys, I no longer believe in a staunch anti-contact argument. My future advocacy will, consequently, not be 100% anti-contact. You and the other NAMbLA types might actually like some of what I have to say. However, I won't be posting misogynistic abuse, racial slurs, or calling people 'cunts'. Everything I say will be calm and grounded. If you're going to represent MAPs, at least behave with some decency. |