Post a response:
|
In case some inexperienced BoyLover would like to see what a prepubescent penis and scrotum look like, you could refer to: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tanner_scale ... which only contains a line drawing :-( But another article has this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puberty#/media/File:Male_genitalia_five_Tanner_stages.png Hmm... the youngest illustration is of a circumcised penis, while the older ones are not circumcised. Curious, that... The other illustrations in that article are strange as well -- the youngest FEMALE child genitalia photograph is of a 3 1/2 year old, while the youngest MALE is 10 years old. Why would that be? SOURCE: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puberty Or you could refer to a textbook: Boys stages of genital and pubic hair development. Source: Reprinted of Elsevier from van Wieringen JC, Wafelbakker F, Verbrugge HP, De Haas JH. Growth Diagrams 1965. Groningen, The Netherlands: Wolters-Noordhoff; 1971. As included in Yen SSC, Jaffe RB, eds. Reproductive Endocrinology: Physiology, Pathophysiology and Clinical Management. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 1978." https://eqipp.aap.org/File%20Library/Courses/Growth/PDFs/BrightFuturePhysicalExamination79_85.pdf Long ago someone here claimed that even medical texts are now censured and no longer showed illustrations of male minor's penii. I guess they were wrong... Despite the available photographic evidence, I would still prefer to see them in real life... ;-) M. You'd think that the AI software would at LEAST have had access to and been trained on Wikipedia articles! |