'Boys must be loved and they must be loved...

for being boys. Only a pederast can do this, because only a pederast loves them for their very boyishness, their haecceity. No other figure can do this." This is the heart of the matter. Thank you for stating it so clearly, to say in a handful of words what took me two long wordy posts to try to bring into focus. Indeed, these words of yours could stand as a creed for what we're about. If it were in my power, I'd be tempted to replace "you are not alone" at the top of the board with those words of yours. But...but...but -- you (inadvertently?) put your finger on the essence of the dilemma that is killing not just us but everything we hold dear when you write "the whole issue cannot be addressed in a roundabout way." And yet we have no choice -- the entire apparatus of formal and informal (i.e., enforced by legions of zombified antis) censorship has been marshaled to prevent addressing the issue in anything other than a roundabout way. I don't recommend you try addressing it directly -- you'll be instantly silenced/cancelled in any forum other than this and will probably invite the police to your door. This is why I find BAP such an intriguing phenomenon. He has figured out a way to say things that we are not allowed to say. Now admittedly, what he says does not include your point directly -- but it hints at it. And what are those things? I'll quote from my review of three years ago: QUOTE that the sexes are not the same, that our society disdains masculinity and persecutes with relentless malevolence all displays of masculine distinctiveness, that the high peaks of human achievement in the arts and sciences are masculine achievements and to be worshiped that the summit of beauty is the nude young male overflowing with life and vitality that there is nothing “wrong” or faggy in responding erotically to that beauty – indeed that it is faggy NOT to respond to it that the feeling so many young men today have of being trapped in an ugly world drained of life and holiness is entirely valid that the friends the young male chooses are his most important choices and his most important relationships UNQUOTE Now a lot of craziness and nonsense surrounds those morsels. But they ARE there. Note also his tactical advice (and here I'm quoting him directly): "You must have an instinct for how much normies are able to take. It isn't even a question of getting them to where you want 'gradually' – I don't think they're able to get very far at all. But they can be moved to defend themselves from the grip of the global slave state, which I also hate, although for different reasons.” “Nationalists must present a healthy alternative to the eternal rule of ugliness in our time: promote nature, beauty, physical fitness, the preservation of high traditions of literature and art. In regards to the latter, it's even a necessity because there's no school or university that will give you a worthwhile education. There are a variety of ways to approach this but I think given the collapse of the Boy Scouts, that a scouting and nature-preservation movement would be one of the best." Translation as I see it: what pederasts should do is found a scouting and nature-preservation movement for boys. You wouldn't quarrel with that, would you? BAP alludes to the historical example - well over a century ago, a pederast founded a scouting and nature-preservation movement for boys -- took off like the proverbial wildfire. Could it be done again? Hmmm... I think perhaps under the aegis of conservative Christians and Jews, Mormons, Buddhists... Anyway, THANK YOU for that beautiful summation of what we're about. SR