Post a response:
|
I can't speak towards how it's used on Twitter, but a Duckduckgo search got me only irrelavent links (except for your own post here which showed up as result number five). At first, the term almost sounded like something the antis might call us instead of the traditional label of "sexual predator." So, not a good term. Too ambiguous like it could refer to someone who uses sex to control someone. Besides, it stinks of in-group virtue signaling. Lefties like to bitch about how they're against racists and fascists when they simply can't understand the nature of the problem. It's easy to tell people that already agree with you that you're against "sex fascism," but any outsider will look at the term and wonder what the hell you're talking about. |