Re: I don't know or believe anything actually.

I phrased that wrongly it should read that intelligent design advocates posit computer code as the language of DNA not, obviously, Darwin. Intelligent design is based on 'irreducible complexity' a term popularised by Behe, even someone as silly as Richard Dawkins confesses that things appear designed and he is a staunch atheist. Intelligent design is seemingly plausible, until you realise its entirely made up of logical fallacies, and holds no water. What logical fallacies and what water doesn't it hold, when you admit it is seemingly plausible? It seems as plausible to me as Darwin's incites into evolution, but then he believed cells were made of some sort of plasma or jell if you please. He knew nothing about cell biology. I just sit on the fence weighing up the pros and cons of of it all. peterkins~