Re: Battle of Sig Pics

I know what a pair of qtz! I want to imagine them together.... Sexual highlight of my adolescence was a night in bed with two other exhausted eighth graders after earning significant bucks (they were happy about that!) loading chickens into trucks on my dad's (okay, our, yes I grew up raising chickens for slaughter!) chicken farm. (Actually I think there were two nights, the loading chickens night and a campout in the desert which I think came later. Second one we all just jacked off, first one was a bit beyond that. Okay, here's a theory. BL's either had lots of sex, or very little, as preteens and adolescents. Lame theory, but sometimes I think I see us falling into those two groups. I was definitely sexually frustrated from the age of 8 or 10, my own fault I think mostly because I was also shy, but I did take some initiative once or twice but never seemed to get me anywhere. Others here, I know, fucked like bunnies. I want to kill them. Okies, no, I believe in total BL solidarity, but damn, that musta been fun. For you. Not me. The boys I was hot for in my preteen and early teen years are still vivid for me. I wasn't totally shut out, but three wet hands, all my own and two of them with my own cum, don't qualify as a sexually satisfying resume for a boy from ages 10 to 22. Naturally it crossed my mind there was something wrong with me. To return to the contrast of two types, from what I read here, the more sexually prolific among us didn't suffer from the same internalized guilt. Their recollection of late childhood and early adolescence tend toward "I fucked all the time and loved every minute of it." Gross generalization, small sample, et cetera. Point is it makes a kind of psychological sense, right? Why should sex with boys be so important to us? (Some of us are obsessive, obviously, I am and I am not ashamed of it but I am interested in why it happened.) Either because we wanted it and didn't get it (and can't get over wanting it) or we got it and loved it (and can't get over wanting it). I am not happy with "can't get over" as a formulation, it's too negative, we either experienced or imagined experiencing an ecstasy with which no other can compare, and why should we now settle for less? Hypothesis: Boys aged 10 to 14 experience their sexual development with varying levels of intensity. Both emotional issues dealing with parental and cultural norms and biological variance in physical reactions may influence this level of intensity. Boys who, during this developmental period, experience either exceptionally intense pleasure in sexual activity with other boys or exceptionally intense frustration about their sexual feelings directed towards other boys are more likely than other boys to identify as boylovers as adults. Counterhypothesis: By about age 10 most boys who as adults will identify as boylovers have already experienced a markedly stronger sexual attraction to other boys than is experienced by boys who will not self-identify as boylovers. Neither the amount of sexual activity in which such boys engage during the age 10 - 14 developmental period, nor the relative intensity of their feelings about that amount of activity, is likely to correlate significantly with subsequent self-identification. hugzu ;-p